1972American Journal of Physical AnthropologyRequires access

Determination of Crown‐Rump length from fetal long bones: Humerus and femur

Lalit Mehta, Harpreet Singh

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lengths of the ossified diaphysis of the humerus and femur were measured in 50 fetuses ranging from 65 to 290 mm Crown‐Rump length. A significant correlation was found between the diaphyseal length and the CR length. No appreciable difference was noted in diaphyseal lengths of the humerus and femur in fetuses of 85 mm CR length or below. Various growth phases were observed. The difference in length of the femur and humerus is due to a comparative slow growth of the humerus during the later period of prenatal life. Diaphyseal growth rates of the humerus and femur are 0.18 mm and 0.21 mm respectively for every 1 mm increase in CR length. Regression coefficients for the lengths of the ossified shaft of the humerus and femur are 5.35 and 5.00 respectively. With the help of these coefficients, CR length of the fetus was estimated within a range of ± 15 mm. From the estimated CR length, age of the fetus was determined with the help of a standard age and size curve with reasonable accuracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Lengths of the ossified diaphysis of the humerus and femur were measured in 50 fetuses ranging from 65 to 290 mm Crown‐Rump length. A significant correlation was found between the diaphyseal length and the CR length. No appreciable difference was noted in diaphyseal lengths of the humerus and femur in fetuses of 85 mm CR length or below. Various growth phases were observed. The difference in length of the femur and humerus is due to a comparative slow growth of the humerus during the later period of prenatal life. Diaphyseal growth rates of the humerus and femur are 0.18 mm and 0.21 mm respectively for every 1 mm increase in CR length. Regression coefficients for the lengths of the ossified shaft of the humerus and femur are 5.35 and 5.00 respectively. With the help of these coefficients, CR length of the fetus was estimated within a range of ± 15 mm. From the estimated CR length, age of the fetus was determined with the help of a standard age and size curve with reasonable accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Lengths of the ossified diaphysis of the humerus and femur were measured in 50 fetuses ranging from 65 to 290 mm Crown‐Rump length. A significant correlation was found between the diaphyseal length and the CR length. No appreciable difference was noted in diaphyseal lengths of the humerus and femur in fetuses of 85 mm CR length or below. Various growth phases were observed. The difference in length of the femur and humerus is due to a comparative slow growth of the humerus during the later period of prenatal life. Diaphyseal growth rates of the humerus and femur are 0.18 mm and 0.21 mm respectively for every 1 mm increase in CR length. Regression coefficients for the lengths of the ossified shaft of the humerus and femur are 5.35 and 5.00 respectively. With the help of these coefficients, CR length of the fetus was estimated within a range of ± 15 mm. From the estimated CR length, age of the fetus was determined with the help of a standard age and size curve with reasonable accuracy.

Key concepts: Humerus, Femur, Diaphysis, Anatomy, Medicine, Fetus, Crown-rump length, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of Crown‐Rump length from fetal long bones: Humerus and femur — Research Paper | ScholarLens