1998•Communications in Statistics - Simulation and ComputationRequires access

A performance-based assessment of robust regression methods

James R. Simpson, Douglas C. Monlgomery

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

A number of robust regression techniques have been proposed as alternatives to least squares when outliers are present in data. No single robust technique is universally accepted as the best. Techniques exhibit strengths and weaknesses depending on the percentage of outliers present, and the location of the outliers in the regressor space. Also, robust techniques perform quite differently when no outliers are present. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate existing and proposed robust methods relative to their performance on a comprehensive group of datasets with and without outliers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate datasets with varying outlier characteristics. The coefficient estimates generated by the robust methods are compared to the true coefficient values. Techniques are then ranked based on their performance. The best performing methods consist of an existing method and a method proposed in this paper

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of robust regression techniques have been proposed as alternatives to least squares when outliers are present in data. No single robust technique is universally accepted as the best. Techniques exhibit strengths and weaknesses depending on the percentage of outliers present, and the location of the outliers in the regressor space. Also, robust techniques perform quite differently when no outliers are present. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate existing and proposed robust methods relative to their performance on a comprehensive group of datasets with and without outliers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate datasets with varying outlier characteristics. The coefficient estimates generated by the robust methods are compared to the true coefficient values. Techniques are then ranked based on their performance. The best performing methods consist of an existing method and a method proposed in this paper

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of robust regression techniques have been proposed as alternatives to least squares when outliers are present in data. No single robust technique is universally accepted as the best. Techniques exhibit strengths and weaknesses depending on the percentage of outliers present, and the location of the outliers in the regressor space. Also, robust techniques perform quite differently when no outliers are present. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate existing and proposed robust methods relative to their performance on a comprehensive group of datasets with and without outliers. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate datasets with varying outlier characteristics. The coefficient estimates generated by the robust methods are compared to the true coefficient values. Techniques are then ranked based on their performance. The best performing methods consist of an existing method and a method proposed in this paper

Key concepts: Outlier, Robust regression, Computer science, Regression, Robust statistics, Data mining, Monte Carlo method, Least trimmed squares

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A performance-based assessment of robust regression methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens