1990Perceptual and Motor SkillsRequires access

Recency Effects and Temporal Distinctiveness: Dissociation between Free Recall and Memory for Position/Order

Koichi Sato

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Temporal distinctiveness hypothesis argues that both short-term and long-term recency effects reflect the high distinctiveness of temporal (i.e., position and order) information in the recency portion. The present study tested this hypothesis. In Exp. 1, recency effects for free recall were compared to those for position/order memory in immediate, delayed, and continuous distractor conditions. Recency effects for both free recall and position/order memory disappeared in the delayed condition. In the continuous distractor condition, large recency effects for free recall reappeared (i.e., long-term recency effects), unaccompanied by the reappearance of recency effects for position/order memory. In Exp. 2, the temporal distinctiveness did not affect short-term recency effects in the immediate free recall. These results indicate that the temporal distinctiveness hypothesis is inadequate for short-term and long-term recency effects in free recall.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Temporal distinctiveness hypothesis argues that both short-term and long-term recency effects reflect the high distinctiveness of temporal (i.e., position and order) information in the recency portion. The present study tested this hypothesis. In Exp. 1, recency effects for free recall were compared to those for position/order memory in immediate, delayed, and continuous distractor conditions. Recency effects for both free recall and position/order memory disappeared in the delayed condition. In the continuous distractor condition, large recency effects for free recall reappeared (i.e., long-term recency effects), unaccompanied by the reappearance of recency effects for position/order memory. In Exp. 2, the temporal distinctiveness did not affect short-term recency effects in the immediate free recall. These results indicate that the temporal distinctiveness hypothesis is inadequate for short-term and long-term recency effects in free recall.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Temporal distinctiveness hypothesis argues that both short-term and long-term recency effects reflect the high distinctiveness of temporal (i.e., position and order) information in the recency portion. The present study tested this hypothesis. In Exp. 1, recency effects for free recall were compared to those for position/order memory in immediate, delayed, and continuous distractor conditions. Recency effects for both free recall and position/order memory disappeared in the delayed condition. In the continuous distractor condition, large recency effects for free recall reappeared (i.e., long-term recency effects), unaccompanied by the reappearance of recency effects for position/order memory. In Exp. 2, the temporal distinctiveness did not affect short-term recency effects in the immediate free recall. These results indicate that the temporal distinctiveness hypothesis is inadequate for short-term and long-term recency effects in free recall.

Key concepts: Optimal distinctiveness theory, Serial position effect, Recall, Free recall, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Dissociation (chemistry), Long-term memory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Recency Effects and Temporal Distinctiveness: Dissociation between Free Recall and Memory for Position/Order — Research Paper | ScholarLens