2013Journal of Dental ImplantsRequires access

Reduction of excess cement during cementation of implant-retained crowns: A clinical tip

ShantanuS Jambhekar, Jay Matani, Tania Sethi, MohitG Kheur

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Introduction of osseointegrated implants has changed the way partially and completely edentulous patients can be treated. Restorations supported by implants can be either cement retained or screw retained. Cement-retained prostheses have gained preference in many cases, making them the restoration of choice for the treatment of implant patients. One of the drawbacks of cement-retained restorations is the extrusion of excess cement into the peri-implant sulcus with subsequent complications. Both the detection and the subsequent removal of the excess cement are significantly complicated by the depth of the gingival sulcus and by the contours of the abutment and the implant crown. A simple chairside technique to minimize the overflow of cement at the time of cementation by the use of a custom-made abutment replica is described here.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction of osseointegrated implants has changed the way partially and completely edentulous patients can be treated. Restorations supported by implants can be either cement retained or screw retained. Cement-retained prostheses have gained preference in many cases, making them the restoration of choice for the treatment of implant patients. One of the drawbacks of cement-retained restorations is the extrusion of excess cement into the peri-implant sulcus with subsequent complications. Both the detection and the subsequent removal of the excess cement are significantly complicated by the depth of the gingival sulcus and by the contours of the abutment and the implant crown. A simple chairside technique to minimize the overflow of cement at the time of cementation by the use of a custom-made abutment replica is described here.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction of osseointegrated implants has changed the way partially and completely edentulous patients can be treated. Restorations supported by implants can be either cement retained or screw retained. Cement-retained prostheses have gained preference in many cases, making them the restoration of choice for the treatment of implant patients. One of the drawbacks of cement-retained restorations is the extrusion of excess cement into the peri-implant sulcus with subsequent complications. Both the detection and the subsequent removal of the excess cement are significantly complicated by the depth of the gingival sulcus and by the contours of the abutment and the implant crown. A simple chairside technique to minimize the overflow of cement at the time of cementation by the use of a custom-made abutment replica is described here.

Key concepts: Cementation (geology), Abutment, Cement, Dentistry, Implant, Crown (dentistry), Medicine, Reduction (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reduction of excess cement during cementation of implant-retained crowns: A clinical tip — Research Paper | ScholarLens