1993•Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and ExperimentalRequires access

A comparison of five commonly prescribed antidepressants with particular reference to their behavioural toxicity

Neil Sherwood, Ian Hindmarch

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Five antidepressant drugs (amitriptyline, dothiepin, lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine) were examined for their effects on psychological function and skilled performance using a meta‐analytical technique for the combination of separate studies. Furthermore, the drugs were placed and contrasted upon dimensions of efficacy, side‐effects, safety in overdose and price in an attempt to formalize and provide a practical example of the considerations which should underlie the selection and use of such compounds. In both these analyses the profile of lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine were found to be favourable compared to those of amitriptyline and dothiepin, suggesting that the prescription of older tricyclic compounds should be the exception rather than the rule in the pharmacotherapy of depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Five antidepressant drugs (amitriptyline, dothiepin, lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine) were examined for their effects on psychological function and skilled performance using a meta‐analytical technique for the combination of separate studies. Furthermore, the drugs were placed and contrasted upon dimensions of efficacy, side‐effects, safety in overdose and price in an attempt to formalize and provide a practical example of the considerations which should underlie the selection and use of such compounds. In both these analyses the profile of lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine were found to be favourable compared to those of amitriptyline and dothiepin, suggesting that the prescription of older tricyclic compounds should be the exception rather than the rule in the pharmacotherapy of depression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Five antidepressant drugs (amitriptyline, dothiepin, lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine) were examined for their effects on psychological function and skilled performance using a meta‐analytical technique for the combination of separate studies. Furthermore, the drugs were placed and contrasted upon dimensions of efficacy, side‐effects, safety in overdose and price in an attempt to formalize and provide a practical example of the considerations which should underlie the selection and use of such compounds. In both these analyses the profile of lofepramine, fluoxetine and paroxetine were found to be favourable compared to those of amitriptyline and dothiepin, suggesting that the prescription of older tricyclic compounds should be the exception rather than the rule in the pharmacotherapy of depression.

Key concepts: Paroxetine, Amitriptyline, Fluoxetine, Tricyclic, Antidepressant, Depression (economics), Tricyclic antidepressant, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source