1993•JAMARequires access

Fee-for-Time System

Tom J. Wachtel

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

SHOULD physicians be paid for anything but their time? The two prevailing modes of physician reimbursement, fee for service and capitation, do not pay physicians solely for their time; therefore, these modes create financial incentives that may affect physician behavior.1,2Salary, the third method of physician payment, is less prevalent in the United States. During the past 50 years, the financial incentives that drive the usual (or prevailing), customary, and reasonable fee-for-service method of physician payment have led to inflated charges with substantial distortions among physician specialties and for various services.3The resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) was created for Medicare to establish an alternative, fair, and equitable fee-for-service physician payment system.4-6The RBRVS bases physician reimbursement on five factors, or resource inputs, that describe a service. One of these factors is patient contact time. The other factors are preservice and postservice time, intensity per unit of

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SHOULD physicians be paid for anything but their time? The two prevailing modes of physician reimbursement, fee for service and capitation, do not pay physicians solely for their time; therefore, these modes create financial incentives that may affect physician behavior.1,2Salary, the third method of physician payment, is less prevalent in the United States. During the past 50 years, the financial incentives that drive the usual (or prevailing), customary, and reasonable fee-for-service method of physician payment have led to inflated charges with substantial distortions among physician specialties and for various services.3The resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) was created for Medicare to establish an alternative, fair, and equitable fee-for-service physician payment system.4-6The RBRVS bases physician reimbursement on five factors, or resource inputs, that describe a service. One of these factors is patient contact time. The other factors are preservice and postservice time, intensity per unit of

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SHOULD physicians be paid for anything but their time? The two prevailing modes of physician reimbursement, fee for service and capitation, do not pay physicians solely for their time; therefore, these modes create financial incentives that may affect physician behavior.1,2Salary, the third method of physician payment, is less prevalent in the United States. During the past 50 years, the financial incentives that drive the usual (or prevailing), customary, and reasonable fee-for-service method of physician payment have led to inflated charges with substantial distortions among physician specialties and for various services.3The resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) was created for Medicare to establish an alternative, fair, and equitable fee-for-service physician payment system.4-6The RBRVS bases physician reimbursement on five factors, or resource inputs, that describe a service. One of these factors is patient contact time. The other factors are preservice and postservice time, intensity per unit of

Key concepts: Capitation, Resource-based relative value scale, Reimbursement, Payment, Salary, Medicine, Incentive, Fee-for-service

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fee-for-Time System — Research Paper | ScholarLens