2010Otology & NeurotologyRequires access

Posterior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Shigenobu Nomiya, Sebahattin Cüreoğlu, Shin Kariya, Norimasa Morita, Rie Nomiya, Patricia A. Schachern, Kazunori Nishizaki, Michael Mauro Paparella

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence has been shown to cause ear symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal, thin bone overlying the posterior semicircular canal, and the normal development of the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. METHODS: The shortest distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa was measured in 1,051 adult human temporal bones (557 cases), and temporal bones with a distance less than 0.1 mm were evaluated. The shortest distance also was measured in 4 fetal temporal bones (2 cases) and 110 temporal bones from children. RESULTS: Of the 1,051 temporal bones, 23 temporal bones (2.2%) had a distance less than 0.1 mm between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. Two temporal bones (0.2%) had posterior semicircular canal dehiscence, and 2 temporal bones had microfractures in the thin bone; however, related clinical symptoms were not confirmed. In children, the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and the posterior cranial fossa increased with age (rho = 0.68, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The histopathologic incidence of posterior semicircular canal dehiscence was lower than the previous radiographic reports. The dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal may be due to a developmental anomaly. In our study, none of the cases with a distance less than 0.1 mm had apparent symptoms related to canal dehiscence syndrome. Other factors, in addition to thinning of the bone, may be required to cause the clinical manifestations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence has been shown to cause ear symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal, thin bone overlying the posterior semicircular canal, and the normal development of the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. METHODS: The shortest distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa was measured in 1,051 adult human temporal bones (557 cases), and temporal bones with a distance less than 0.1 mm were evaluated. The shortest distance also was measured in 4 fetal temporal bones (2 cases) and 110 temporal bones from children. RESULTS: Of the 1,051 temporal bones, 23 temporal bones (2.2%) had a distance less than 0.1 mm between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. Two temporal bones (0.2%) had posterior semicircular canal dehiscence, and 2 temporal bones had microfractures in the thin bone; however, related clinical symptoms were not confirmed. In children, the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and the posterior cranial fossa increased with age (rho = 0.68, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The histopathologic incidence of posterior semicircular canal dehiscence was lower than the previous radiographic reports. The dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal may be due to a developmental anomaly. In our study, none of the cases with a distance less than 0.1 mm had apparent symptoms related to canal dehiscence syndrome. Other factors, in addition to thinning of the bone, may be required to cause the clinical manifestations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence has been shown to cause ear symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal, thin bone overlying the posterior semicircular canal, and the normal development of the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. METHODS: The shortest distance between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa was measured in 1,051 adult human temporal bones (557 cases), and temporal bones with a distance less than 0.1 mm were evaluated. The shortest distance also was measured in 4 fetal temporal bones (2 cases) and 110 temporal bones from children. RESULTS: Of the 1,051 temporal bones, 23 temporal bones (2.2%) had a distance less than 0.1 mm between the posterior semicircular canal and posterior cranial fossa. Two temporal bones (0.2%) had posterior semicircular canal dehiscence, and 2 temporal bones had microfractures in the thin bone; however, related clinical symptoms were not confirmed. In children, the distance between the posterior semicircular canal and the posterior cranial fossa increased with age (rho = 0.68, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The histopathologic incidence of posterior semicircular canal dehiscence was lower than the previous radiographic reports. The dehiscence of the posterior semicircular canal may be due to a developmental anomaly. In our study, none of the cases with a distance less than 0.1 mm had apparent symptoms related to canal dehiscence syndrome. Other factors, in addition to thinning of the bone, may be required to cause the clinical manifestations.

Key concepts: Posterior Semicircular Canal, Semicircular canal, Dehiscence, Medicine, Anatomy, Posterior cranial fossa, Temporal bone, Middle cranial fossa

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Posterior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence — Research Paper | ScholarLens