1973Journal of the Illuminating Engineering SocietyRequires access

Monetary Values Drivers Place on Comfort in Night Driving

R N Schwab, Daniel P. Solomon, J. F. Lyons

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

THE RESEARCH REPORTED WAS CARRIED OUT TO DETERMINE THE MONEY DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR ADDITIONAL NIGHT DRIVING COMFORT, WHEN GIVEN A CHOICE BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS WHICH PROVIDE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF COMFORT. THREE HEADLAMP SYSTEMS, CONVENTIONAL LOW BEAM (LB), CONVENTIONAL HIGH BEAM (HB), AND HIGH INTENSITY POLARIZED BEAM (HIP), WERE USED TO DEMONSTRATE DEGREE OF COMFORT BY EXPOSING THE DRIVER TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GLARE FROM ONCOMING HEADLIGHTS. THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PROCEDURE DESCRIBED SHOWED THAT OLDER DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY CONSIDERABLY FOR A LOW-GLARE SYSTEM WHEN OFFERED A FREE HIGH-GLARE SYSTEM. YOUNGER LESS GLARE-SENSITIVE DRIVERS WERE WILLING TO PAY LESS. A DISCUSSION IS APPENDED. /TRRL/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

THE RESEARCH REPORTED WAS CARRIED OUT TO DETERMINE THE MONEY DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR ADDITIONAL NIGHT DRIVING COMFORT, WHEN GIVEN A CHOICE BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS WHICH PROVIDE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF COMFORT. THREE HEADLAMP SYSTEMS, CONVENTIONAL LOW BEAM (LB), CONVENTIONAL HIGH BEAM (HB), AND HIGH INTENSITY POLARIZED BEAM (HIP), WERE USED TO DEMONSTRATE DEGREE OF COMFORT BY EXPOSING THE DRIVER TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GLARE FROM ONCOMING HEADLIGHTS. THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PROCEDURE DESCRIBED SHOWED THAT OLDER DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY CONSIDERABLY FOR A LOW-GLARE SYSTEM WHEN OFFERED A FREE HIGH-GLARE SYSTEM. YOUNGER LESS GLARE-SENSITIVE DRIVERS WERE WILLING TO PAY LESS. A DISCUSSION IS APPENDED. /TRRL/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

THE RESEARCH REPORTED WAS CARRIED OUT TO DETERMINE THE MONEY DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR ADDITIONAL NIGHT DRIVING COMFORT, WHEN GIVEN A CHOICE BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE HEADLIGHT SYSTEMS WHICH PROVIDE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF COMFORT. THREE HEADLAMP SYSTEMS, CONVENTIONAL LOW BEAM (LB), CONVENTIONAL HIGH BEAM (HB), AND HIGH INTENSITY POLARIZED BEAM (HIP), WERE USED TO DEMONSTRATE DEGREE OF COMFORT BY EXPOSING THE DRIVER TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GLARE FROM ONCOMING HEADLIGHTS. THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PROCEDURE DESCRIBED SHOWED THAT OLDER DRIVERS ARE WILLING TO PAY CONSIDERABLY FOR A LOW-GLARE SYSTEM WHEN OFFERED A FREE HIGH-GLARE SYSTEM. YOUNGER LESS GLARE-SENSITIVE DRIVERS WERE WILLING TO PAY LESS. A DISCUSSION IS APPENDED. /TRRL/

Key concepts: GLARE, Headlamp, Night vision, Beam (structure), Automotive engineering, Engineering, Simulation, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monetary Values Drivers Place on Comfort in Night Driving — Research Paper | ScholarLens