2012•Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaRequires access

Modeling Geometrical Spreading and the Relative Amplitudes of Vertical and Horizontal High-Frequency Ground Motions in Eastern North America

Martin C. Chapman, R. W. Godbee

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

Abstract Horizontally layered velocity models were used with point‐source and finite‐fault sources to investigate geometrical spreading and the relative amplitudes of vertical and horizontal ground acceleration within 120 km of the source. Full‐wave‐field simulations were done for a range of focal depths and for strike‐slip and reverse focal mechanisms. The attenuation of the geometric mean of randomly oriented horizontal‐component maximum acceleration amplitudes, averaged over all azimuths, significantly exceeds the theoretical geometrical spreading for far‐field body waves in a homogeneous whole space for hypocentral distances less than approximately 60 km. The behavior of the vertical component is different from the horizontal: vertical attenuation near the epicenter is greater and is more dependent on source mechanism and depth. Because of the rapid near‐source decay of the direct S wave, reflections from the mid‐lower crust and Moho control the maximum amplitude of the vertical‐component acceleration in the 60–120‐km hypocenter distance range, resulting in a flattening of the vertical amplitude‐distance relation. Near‐source vertical maximum amplitudes averaged over all source–receiver azimuths tend to be less than the geometric mean horizontal amplitude for strike‐slip focal mechanisms, but, near the source for reverse faults, the azimuthally averaged vertical‐component amplitude exceeds that of the geometric mean horizontal. The modeling indicates that similar vertical‐ and horizontal‐component geometrical spreading and approximately constant horizontal/vertical amplitude ratios observed in connection with the Lg phase at distances greater than approximately 100 km in eastern North America may not hold at smaller distances. Ground‐motion prediction models for the vertical component near the source may need to incorporate strong geometrical spreading and dependence on radiation pattern.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Horizontally layered velocity models were used with point‐source and finite‐fault sources to investigate geometrical spreading and the relative amplitudes of vertical and horizontal ground acceleration within 120 km of the source. Full‐wave‐field simulations were done for a range of focal depths and for strike‐slip and reverse focal mechanisms. The attenuation of the geometric mean of randomly oriented horizontal‐component maximum acceleration amplitudes, averaged over all azimuths, significantly exceeds the theoretical geometrical spreading for far‐field body waves in a homogeneous whole space for hypocentral distances less than approximately 60 km. The behavior of the vertical component is different from the horizontal: vertical attenuation near the epicenter is greater and is more dependent on source mechanism and depth. Because of the rapid near‐source decay of the direct S wave, reflections from the mid‐lower crust and Moho control the maximum amplitude of the vertical‐component acceleration in the 60–120‐km hypocenter distance range, resulting in a flattening of the vertical amplitude‐distance relation. Near‐source vertical maximum amplitudes averaged over all source–receiver azimuths tend to be less than the geometric mean horizontal amplitude for strike‐slip focal mechanisms, but, near the source for reverse faults, the azimuthally averaged vertical‐component amplitude exceeds that of the geometric mean horizontal. The modeling indicates that similar vertical‐ and horizontal‐component geometrical spreading and approximately constant horizontal/vertical amplitude ratios observed in connection with the Lg phase at distances greater than approximately 100 km in eastern North America may not hold at smaller distances. Ground‐motion prediction models for the vertical component near the source may need to incorporate strong geometrical spreading and dependence on radiation pattern.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Horizontally layered velocity models were used with point‐source and finite‐fault sources to investigate geometrical spreading and the relative amplitudes of vertical and horizontal ground acceleration within 120 km of the source. Full‐wave‐field simulations were done for a range of focal depths and for strike‐slip and reverse focal mechanisms. The attenuation of the geometric mean of randomly oriented horizontal‐component maximum acceleration amplitudes, averaged over all azimuths, significantly exceeds the theoretical geometrical spreading for far‐field body waves in a homogeneous whole space for hypocentral distances less than approximately 60 km. The behavior of the vertical component is different from the horizontal: vertical attenuation near the epicenter is greater and is more dependent on source mechanism and depth. Because of the rapid near‐source decay of the direct S wave, reflections from the mid‐lower crust and Moho control the maximum amplitude of the vertical‐component acceleration in the 60–120‐km hypocenter distance range, resulting in a flattening of the vertical amplitude‐distance relation. Near‐source vertical maximum amplitudes averaged over all source–receiver azimuths tend to be less than the geometric mean horizontal amplitude for strike‐slip focal mechanisms, but, near the source for reverse faults, the azimuthally averaged vertical‐component amplitude exceeds that of the geometric mean horizontal. The modeling indicates that similar vertical‐ and horizontal‐component geometrical spreading and approximately constant horizontal/vertical amplitude ratios observed in connection with the Lg phase at distances greater than approximately 100 km in eastern North America may not hold at smaller distances. Ground‐motion prediction models for the vertical component near the source may need to incorporate strong geometrical spreading and dependence on radiation pattern.

Key concepts: Amplitude, Geology, Horizontal and vertical, Geodesy, Seismology, Geometry, Physics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling Geometrical Spreading and the Relative Amplitudes of Vertical and Horizontal High-Frequency Ground Motions in Eastern North America — Research Paper | ScholarLens