1990Acta SociologicaRequires access

Structures of Modern Poverty

Staffan Marklund

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The current debate on poverty m the Western world is influenced by concepts such as the feminization of poverty, marginalization of the poor, the poor underclass and the culture of poverty. These concepts are often used in a contradictory and confusing manner This article is an attempt to look at the theoretical position behind the concepts and to examine similarities and differences between them. Furthermore, the empirical consequences of the four concepts are analyzed and related to information about poverty m the Scandinavian nations. As empirically investigated by Scandinavians, poverty does not in general fit into either of the four conceptualizations. Neither the feminization-of-poverty debate nor the debate on the culture of poverty seems relevant to Scandinavia. The underclass and marginalization concepts are more frequently used, but due to both theoretical inconsistency and lack of relevant data the two views are rarely tested against each other or, indeed, tested at all.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current debate on poverty m the Western world is influenced by concepts such as the feminization of poverty, marginalization of the poor, the poor underclass and the culture of poverty. These concepts are often used in a contradictory and confusing manner This article is an attempt to look at the theoretical position behind the concepts and to examine similarities and differences between them. Furthermore, the empirical consequences of the four concepts are analyzed and related to information about poverty m the Scandinavian nations. As empirically investigated by Scandinavians, poverty does not in general fit into either of the four conceptualizations. Neither the feminization-of-poverty debate nor the debate on the culture of poverty seems relevant to Scandinavia. The underclass and marginalization concepts are more frequently used, but due to both theoretical inconsistency and lack of relevant data the two views are rarely tested against each other or, indeed, tested at all.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current debate on poverty m the Western world is influenced by concepts such as the feminization of poverty, marginalization of the poor, the poor underclass and the culture of poverty. These concepts are often used in a contradictory and confusing manner This article is an attempt to look at the theoretical position behind the concepts and to examine similarities and differences between them. Furthermore, the empirical consequences of the four concepts are analyzed and related to information about poverty m the Scandinavian nations. As empirically investigated by Scandinavians, poverty does not in general fit into either of the four conceptualizations. Neither the feminization-of-poverty debate nor the debate on the culture of poverty seems relevant to Scandinavia. The underclass and marginalization concepts are more frequently used, but due to both theoretical inconsistency and lack of relevant data the two views are rarely tested against each other or, indeed, tested at all.

Key concepts: Underclass, Poverty, Culture of poverty, Sociology, Positive economics, Development economics, Political science, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Structures of Modern Poverty — Research Paper | ScholarLens