2005Clinical Cancer ResearchOpen access

Relation of Erythropoietin and Erythropoietin Receptor Expression to Hypoxia and Anemia in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Stuart C. Winter, KETAN A. SHAH, Leticia Campo, Helen Turley, Russell Leek, Rogan Corbridge, Graham J. Cox, Adrian L. Harris

Open full text 46 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of erythropoietin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been associated with poor survival. This study examines the protein and mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in HNSCC and their relation to hypoxia, hemoglobin (Hb), and clinical outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The immunohistochemical expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was assessed in 151 cases of HNSCC. Expression was compared with the hypoxia-dependent proteins hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9) and correlated with clinical outcome. The mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was measured in paired samples of HNSCC. RESULTS: Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor were expressed in 95% and 99% of tumors, respectively. Using a weighed expression score, there was a positive correlation between erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression (r = 0.18, P = 0.03). HIF-1alpha (r = 0.38, P < 0.01) and CA-9 (r = 0.26, P = 0.002) correlated with erythropoietin expression, but there was no correlation with erythropoietin receptor. No correlation was found between Hb and erythropoietin (r = 0.07, P = 0.36) or erythropoietin receptor (r = -0.02, P = 0.8), and no survival difference between high and low erythropoietin or erythropoietin receptor expression (P = 0.59 and P = 0.98, respectively). The mRNA expression of erythropoietin (P = 0.03) but not erythropoietin receptor (P = 0.62) was significantly increased in 11 paired samples of HNSCC. CONCLUSION: In vivo, the HIF pathway regulates erythropoietin at the mRNA level but not erythropoietin receptor expression in HNSCC. Anemia does not seem to influence the hypoxic microenvironment of tumors sufficiently to alter the expression of erythropoietin. The effects of exogenous erythropoietin may be acting via receptors expressed on tumor cells in vivo, or on vascular cells, which also express the pathway.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The use of erythropoietin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been associated with poor survival. This study examines the protein and mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in HNSCC and their relation to hypoxia, hemoglobin (Hb), and clinical outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The immunohistochemical expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was assessed in 151 cases of HNSCC. Expression was compared with the hypoxia-dependent proteins hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9) and correlated with clinical outcome. The mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was measured in paired samples of HNSCC. RESULTS: Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor were expressed in 95% and 99% of tumors, respectively. Using a weighed expression score, there was a positive correlation between erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression (r = 0.18, P = 0.03). HIF-1alpha (r = 0.38, P < 0.01) and CA-9 (r = 0.26, P = 0.002) correlated with erythropoietin expression, but there was no correlation with erythropoietin receptor. No correlation was found between Hb and erythropoietin (r = 0.07, P = 0.36) or erythropoietin receptor (r = -0.02, P = 0.8), and no survival difference between high and low erythropoietin or erythropoietin receptor expression (P = 0.59 and P = 0.98, respectively). The mRNA expression of erythropoietin (P = 0.03) but not erythropoietin receptor (P = 0.62) was significantly increased in 11 paired samples of HNSCC. CONCLUSION: In vivo, the HIF pathway regulates erythropoietin at the mRNA level but not erythropoietin receptor expression in HNSCC. Anemia does not seem to influence the hypoxic microenvironment of tumors sufficiently to alter the expression of erythropoietin. The effects of exogenous erythropoietin may be acting via receptors expressed on tumor cells in vivo, or on vascular cells, which also express the pathway.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The use of erythropoietin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been associated with poor survival. This study examines the protein and mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in HNSCC and their relation to hypoxia, hemoglobin (Hb), and clinical outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The immunohistochemical expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was assessed in 151 cases of HNSCC. Expression was compared with the hypoxia-dependent proteins hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9) and correlated with clinical outcome. The mRNA expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor was measured in paired samples of HNSCC. RESULTS: Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor were expressed in 95% and 99% of tumors, respectively. Using a weighed expression score, there was a positive correlation between erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression (r = 0.18, P = 0.03). HIF-1alpha (r = 0.38, P < 0.01) and CA-9 (r = 0.26, P = 0.002) correlated with erythropoietin expression, but there was no correlation with erythropoietin receptor. No correlation was found between Hb and erythropoietin (r = 0.07, P = 0.36) or erythropoietin receptor (r = -0.02, P = 0.8), and no survival difference between high and low erythropoietin or erythropoietin receptor expression (P = 0.59 and P = 0.98, respectively). The mRNA expression of erythropoietin (P = 0.03) but not erythropoietin receptor (P = 0.62) was significantly increased in 11 paired samples of HNSCC. CONCLUSION: In vivo, the HIF pathway regulates erythropoietin at the mRNA level but not erythropoietin receptor expression in HNSCC. Anemia does not seem to influence the hypoxic microenvironment of tumors sufficiently to alter the expression of erythropoietin. The effects of exogenous erythropoietin may be acting via receptors expressed on tumor cells in vivo, or on vascular cells, which also express the pathway.

Key concepts: Erythropoietin, Erythropoietin receptor, Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, Hypoxia (environmental), SOCS2, Internal medicine, Receptor, Receptor expression

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relation of Erythropoietin and Erythropoietin Receptor Expression to Hypoxia and Anemia in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens