2007•Common Law World ReviewOpen access

An Angel Named ‘The Bank’: The Bank's Fiduciary Duty as the Basic Theory in Israeli Banking Law

Ruth Plato‐Shinar

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The concept of imposing a fiduciary duty on banks is not originally an Israeli one. The Israeli courts adopted it from English principles of equity. However, from the moment it was introduced into Israeli law, the courts have expanded it far beyond its original equitable counterpart. This process of expansion has been performed in various ways: in terms of the content of the duty; in terms of the scope of the beneficiaries—other than customers—that are entitled to the duty; or in terms of the remedies granted in respect of breach thereof. As a result of this process, the Israeli concept of the banks' fiduciary duty has evolved over the years. From a narrowly applied duty, as in English common law, it became the basic theory in Israeli banking law. The article examines this interesting process from a critical point of view.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The concept of imposing a fiduciary duty on banks is not originally an Israeli one. The Israeli courts adopted it from English principles of equity. However, from the moment it was introduced into Israeli law, the courts have expanded it far beyond its original equitable counterpart. This process of expansion has been performed in various ways: in terms of the content of the duty; in terms of the scope of the beneficiaries—other than customers—that are entitled to the duty; or in terms of the remedies granted in respect of breach thereof. As a result of this process, the Israeli concept of the banks' fiduciary duty has evolved over the years. From a narrowly applied duty, as in English common law, it became the basic theory in Israeli banking law. The article examines this interesting process from a critical point of view.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The concept of imposing a fiduciary duty on banks is not originally an Israeli one. The Israeli courts adopted it from English principles of equity. However, from the moment it was introduced into Israeli law, the courts have expanded it far beyond its original equitable counterpart. This process of expansion has been performed in various ways: in terms of the content of the duty; in terms of the scope of the beneficiaries—other than customers—that are entitled to the duty; or in terms of the remedies granted in respect of breach thereof. As a result of this process, the Israeli concept of the banks' fiduciary duty has evolved over the years. From a narrowly applied duty, as in English common law, it became the basic theory in Israeli banking law. The article examines this interesting process from a critical point of view.

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Duty, Law, Business, Financial system, Law and economics, Economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Angel Named ‘The Bank’: The Bank's Fiduciary Duty as the Basic Theory in Israeli Banking Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens