2011The American Review of Public AdministrationRequires access

State Tax Policy and State Sales Taxes

John L. Mikesell

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Tax expenditure budgets provide a window into intended tax policy. They sort the mixture that adopted tax laws represent by dividing tax structures into provisions that define how revenue is to be raised (tax policy) and provisions that deliver preferences to certain economic entities (budget policy). A review of individual state sales tax expenditure budgets reveals considerable confusion about the tax policy intent of retail sales taxes for distributing the tax burden, although they do suggest general agreement, at least implicitly, that the tax is intended as a general tax on household consumption. An investigation of the major components of these reports, however, reveals major differences across states, partly because of differing exemption patterns in state laws, partly because of differing state economies, but also partly because of differences in how the states define the normal structure for the tax. While some states identify consumption as the normal base fairly directly, other states have less focus and that shows up particularly in ambiguous treatment of purchases made by businesses and of services omitted from the tax base. Many states would profit from a focused discussion with lawmakers about the ideal revenue intent of their retail sales taxes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tax expenditure budgets provide a window into intended tax policy. They sort the mixture that adopted tax laws represent by dividing tax structures into provisions that define how revenue is to be raised (tax policy) and provisions that deliver preferences to certain economic entities (budget policy). A review of individual state sales tax expenditure budgets reveals considerable confusion about the tax policy intent of retail sales taxes for distributing the tax burden, although they do suggest general agreement, at least implicitly, that the tax is intended as a general tax on household consumption. An investigation of the major components of these reports, however, reveals major differences across states, partly because of differing exemption patterns in state laws, partly because of differing state economies, but also partly because of differences in how the states define the normal structure for the tax. While some states identify consumption as the normal base fairly directly, other states have less focus and that shows up particularly in ambiguous treatment of purchases made by businesses and of services omitted from the tax base. Many states would profit from a focused discussion with lawmakers about the ideal revenue intent of their retail sales taxes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tax expenditure budgets provide a window into intended tax policy. They sort the mixture that adopted tax laws represent by dividing tax structures into provisions that define how revenue is to be raised (tax policy) and provisions that deliver preferences to certain economic entities (budget policy). A review of individual state sales tax expenditure budgets reveals considerable confusion about the tax policy intent of retail sales taxes for distributing the tax burden, although they do suggest general agreement, at least implicitly, that the tax is intended as a general tax on household consumption. An investigation of the major components of these reports, however, reveals major differences across states, partly because of differing exemption patterns in state laws, partly because of differing state economies, but also partly because of differences in how the states define the normal structure for the tax. While some states identify consumption as the normal base fairly directly, other states have less focus and that shows up particularly in ambiguous treatment of purchases made by businesses and of services omitted from the tax base. Many states would profit from a focused discussion with lawmakers about the ideal revenue intent of their retail sales taxes.

Key concepts: Sales tax, Value-added tax, Ad valorem tax, Indirect tax, Tax reform, Direct tax, Public economics, Consumption tax

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
State Tax Policy and State Sales Taxes — Research Paper | ScholarLens