1992•Publius The Journal of FederalismRequires access

State Sovereignty and the Eleventh Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court: The 1988 Term

Vicki C. Jackson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

During its 1988 term, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed two important aspects of the Eleventh Amendment, which generally protects states from being sued in federal courts. First, the Court held that the Congress has power to abrogate states' immunity from suit—to subject states to suits in federal courts for damages—under Congress' expansive commerce-clause power. Second, the Court made clear that such abrogation would be found only where the text of the statute itself, as distinct from its legislative history, clearly and specifically so provided. This article describes these decisions, and analyzes some of their implications for judicial federalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During its 1988 term, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed two important aspects of the Eleventh Amendment, which generally protects states from being sued in federal courts. First, the Court held that the Congress has power to abrogate states' immunity from suit—to subject states to suits in federal courts for damages—under Congress' expansive commerce-clause power. Second, the Court made clear that such abrogation would be found only where the text of the statute itself, as distinct from its legislative history, clearly and specifically so provided. This article describes these decisions, and analyzes some of their implications for judicial federalism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During its 1988 term, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed two important aspects of the Eleventh Amendment, which generally protects states from being sued in federal courts. First, the Court held that the Congress has power to abrogate states' immunity from suit—to subject states to suits in federal courts for damages—under Congress' expansive commerce-clause power. Second, the Court made clear that such abrogation would be found only where the text of the statute itself, as distinct from its legislative history, clearly and specifically so provided. This article describes these decisions, and analyzes some of their implications for judicial federalism.

Key concepts: Eleventh, Supreme court, Law, Political science, Sovereign immunity, State (computer science), Term (time), Sovereignty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
State Sovereignty and the Eleventh Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court: The 1988 Term — Research Paper | ScholarLens