1989Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineRequires access

Umbilical Cord Circumference at Birth

Daksha Patel

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Sir .—Recently, we saw a newborn who presented with swelling of the umbilical cord. The cord measured 70 mm at its attachment to the umbilicus (Figure). Examination on palpation revealed the presence of crepitus in the cord, and, interestingly, the abdominal roentgenogram revealed loops of bowel herniating through the defect in the umbilicus. The patient was immediately referred to a pediatric surgeon. Subsequently, we became concerned that if the cord had had been clamped near the base, it would have resulted in an intestinal obstruction. 1 This episode caused us to examine the following questions: (1) What is the normal size of the neonatal umbilical cord? (2) Do the newborn's measurements and weight have any relation ship to the size of the cord at birth? Review of the literature indicated that much is known about abnormalities of the cord, such as granulomas, infections, and hernias. However, we found no information about the normal cord circumference and the factors that correlate with it.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sir .—Recently, we saw a newborn who presented with swelling of the umbilical cord. The cord measured 70 mm at its attachment to the umbilicus (Figure). Examination on palpation revealed the presence of crepitus in the cord, and, interestingly, the abdominal roentgenogram revealed loops of bowel herniating through the defect in the umbilicus. The patient was immediately referred to a pediatric surgeon. Subsequently, we became concerned that if the cord had had been clamped near the base, it would have resulted in an intestinal obstruction. 1 This episode caused us to examine the following questions: (1) What is the normal size of the neonatal umbilical cord? (2) Do the newborn's measurements and weight have any relation ship to the size of the cord at birth? Review of the literature indicated that much is known about abnormalities of the cord, such as granulomas, infections, and hernias. However, we found no information about the normal cord circumference and the factors that correlate with it.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sir .—Recently, we saw a newborn who presented with swelling of the umbilical cord. The cord measured 70 mm at its attachment to the umbilicus (Figure). Examination on palpation revealed the presence of crepitus in the cord, and, interestingly, the abdominal roentgenogram revealed loops of bowel herniating through the defect in the umbilicus. The patient was immediately referred to a pediatric surgeon. Subsequently, we became concerned that if the cord had had been clamped near the base, it would have resulted in an intestinal obstruction. 1 This episode caused us to examine the following questions: (1) What is the normal size of the neonatal umbilical cord? (2) Do the newborn's measurements and weight have any relation ship to the size of the cord at birth? Review of the literature indicated that much is known about abnormalities of the cord, such as granulomas, infections, and hernias. However, we found no information about the normal cord circumference and the factors that correlate with it.

Key concepts: Umbilicus (mollusc), Umbilical cord, Cord, Medicine, Palpation, Circumference, Navel, Birth weight

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Umbilical Cord Circumference at Birth — Research Paper | ScholarLens