1969Annals of Internal MedicineRequires access

Nalidixic Acid and Oxolinic Acid in the Treatment of Chronic Bacteriuria

Ernest Atlas, HUGH CLARK, FREDERICK SILVERBLATT, MARVIN TURCK

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

The effects two organic acid antimicrobials, nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid, were compared in vitro and in patients with chronic bacteriuria. Oxolinic acid was found to be more active in inhibiting Enterobacteriaceae, whereas neither agent was very effective against strains of Pseudomonas. Both nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid appeared less active when tested against a higher inoculum of bacterial cells. This difference was more pronounced with nalidixic acid and was most marked when tested in liquid medium. The results of a controlled clinical trial in 54 patients demonstrated that treatment with 2 g/day oxolinic acid was associated with less emergence of resistance during therapy than was the case with 4 g/day nalidixic acid. Although the relative role of these agents in the treatment of chronic bacteriuria remains uncertain, it appears that oxolinic acid, because of its decreased tendency to evoke highly resistant mutants, has distinct potential advantages over nalidixic acid.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects two organic acid antimicrobials, nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid, were compared in vitro and in patients with chronic bacteriuria. Oxolinic acid was found to be more active in inhibiting Enterobacteriaceae, whereas neither agent was very effective against strains of Pseudomonas. Both nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid appeared less active when tested against a higher inoculum of bacterial cells. This difference was more pronounced with nalidixic acid and was most marked when tested in liquid medium. The results of a controlled clinical trial in 54 patients demonstrated that treatment with 2 g/day oxolinic acid was associated with less emergence of resistance during therapy than was the case with 4 g/day nalidixic acid. Although the relative role of these agents in the treatment of chronic bacteriuria remains uncertain, it appears that oxolinic acid, because of its decreased tendency to evoke highly resistant mutants, has distinct potential advantages over nalidixic acid.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects two organic acid antimicrobials, nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid, were compared in vitro and in patients with chronic bacteriuria. Oxolinic acid was found to be more active in inhibiting Enterobacteriaceae, whereas neither agent was very effective against strains of Pseudomonas. Both nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid appeared less active when tested against a higher inoculum of bacterial cells. This difference was more pronounced with nalidixic acid and was most marked when tested in liquid medium. The results of a controlled clinical trial in 54 patients demonstrated that treatment with 2 g/day oxolinic acid was associated with less emergence of resistance during therapy than was the case with 4 g/day nalidixic acid. Although the relative role of these agents in the treatment of chronic bacteriuria remains uncertain, it appears that oxolinic acid, because of its decreased tendency to evoke highly resistant mutants, has distinct potential advantages over nalidixic acid.

Key concepts: Nalidixic acid, Oxolinic acid, Microbiology, Bacteriuria, Medicine, Pharmacology, Antibiotics, Urine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nalidixic Acid and Oxolinic Acid in the Treatment of Chronic Bacteriuria — Research Paper | ScholarLens