1989•Basic and Applied Social PsychologyRequires access

Appraisal Processes, Coping, and the Regulation of Stress-Related Emotions in a College Examination

Rodolfo Abella, Richard Heslin

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

People differ dramatically in their suspectibility to stress, and attempts are being made to understand why. In this study, predictions were made concerning the role cognitions and coping strategies play in generating poststress emotions. Specifically, the following two hypotheses were tested: (a) that the appraisal of a forthcoming stressful event influences the direction of emotions experienced, and (b) that the adaptiveness of a particular coping pattern is a result of how well the coping style used (i.e., active or avoidant) matches the person's original appraisal of the situation. The results supported the proposed hypotheses. First, outcome expectancies influenced the tone of emotions experienced prior to an exam. Second, coping interacted with expectancy appraisals to affect emotions experienced after the exam. It was concluded that a flexible coping style, one that is responsive to circumstantial demands and constraints, is most adaptive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

People differ dramatically in their suspectibility to stress, and attempts are being made to understand why. In this study, predictions were made concerning the role cognitions and coping strategies play in generating poststress emotions. Specifically, the following two hypotheses were tested: (a) that the appraisal of a forthcoming stressful event influences the direction of emotions experienced, and (b) that the adaptiveness of a particular coping pattern is a result of how well the coping style used (i.e., active or avoidant) matches the person's original appraisal of the situation. The results supported the proposed hypotheses. First, outcome expectancies influenced the tone of emotions experienced prior to an exam. Second, coping interacted with expectancy appraisals to affect emotions experienced after the exam. It was concluded that a flexible coping style, one that is responsive to circumstantial demands and constraints, is most adaptive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

People differ dramatically in their suspectibility to stress, and attempts are being made to understand why. In this study, predictions were made concerning the role cognitions and coping strategies play in generating poststress emotions. Specifically, the following two hypotheses were tested: (a) that the appraisal of a forthcoming stressful event influences the direction of emotions experienced, and (b) that the adaptiveness of a particular coping pattern is a result of how well the coping style used (i.e., active or avoidant) matches the person's original appraisal of the situation. The results supported the proposed hypotheses. First, outcome expectancies influenced the tone of emotions experienced prior to an exam. Second, coping interacted with expectancy appraisals to affect emotions experienced after the exam. It was concluded that a flexible coping style, one that is responsive to circumstantial demands and constraints, is most adaptive.

Key concepts: Psychology, Coping (psychology), Cognitive appraisal, Expectancy theory, Social psychology, Circumstantial evidence, Cognition, Appraisal theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Appraisal Processes, Coping, and the Regulation of Stress-Related Emotions in a College Examination — Research Paper | ScholarLens