2005Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ARequires access

Gentamicin‐loaded bone cement with clindamycin or fusidic acid added: Biofilm formation and antibiotic release

Daniëlle Neut, Erik P. de Groot, Rick S. Z. Kowalski, Jim R. van Horn, Henny C. van der Mei, Henk J. Busscher

Open publisher page 66 citations

Abstract

The formation of staphylococcal biofilms on experimental bone cements, loaded with 0.5 or 1.0 g of active gentamicin and an additional equivalent amount of gentamicin, clindamycin, or fusidic acid was investigated. The biofilms were formed in a modified Robbins device over a 3-day time span and the influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the number of colony forming units relative to the corresponding bone cement containing only gentamicin. Combinations of gentamicin with either fusidic acid or clindamycin reduced growth of clinical isolates of both gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and gentamicin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci to approximately 28%. To determine whether adding a second antibiotic has influence on the gentamicin release, cement blocks were placed in phosphate buffer and aliquots were taken at designated sampling intervals. The influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the percentage released of the total amount of antibiotic incorporated in the different bone cements. After 3 days, all bone cements had released similar percentages of gentamicin, whereas more clindamycin and fusidic acid were released after doubling their concentration in the bone cements. In conclusion, bone cements loaded with combinations of gentamicin and clindamycin or fusidic acid are more effective in preventing biofilm formation than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. In addition, the presence of clindamycin or fusidic acid in gentamicin-loaded bone cement has no influence on the total gentamicin release.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The formation of staphylococcal biofilms on experimental bone cements, loaded with 0.5 or 1.0 g of active gentamicin and an additional equivalent amount of gentamicin, clindamycin, or fusidic acid was investigated. The biofilms were formed in a modified Robbins device over a 3-day time span and the influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the number of colony forming units relative to the corresponding bone cement containing only gentamicin. Combinations of gentamicin with either fusidic acid or clindamycin reduced growth of clinical isolates of both gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and gentamicin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci to approximately 28%. To determine whether adding a second antibiotic has influence on the gentamicin release, cement blocks were placed in phosphate buffer and aliquots were taken at designated sampling intervals. The influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the percentage released of the total amount of antibiotic incorporated in the different bone cements. After 3 days, all bone cements had released similar percentages of gentamicin, whereas more clindamycin and fusidic acid were released after doubling their concentration in the bone cements. In conclusion, bone cements loaded with combinations of gentamicin and clindamycin or fusidic acid are more effective in preventing biofilm formation than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. In addition, the presence of clindamycin or fusidic acid in gentamicin-loaded bone cement has no influence on the total gentamicin release.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The formation of staphylococcal biofilms on experimental bone cements, loaded with 0.5 or 1.0 g of active gentamicin and an additional equivalent amount of gentamicin, clindamycin, or fusidic acid was investigated. The biofilms were formed in a modified Robbins device over a 3-day time span and the influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the number of colony forming units relative to the corresponding bone cement containing only gentamicin. Combinations of gentamicin with either fusidic acid or clindamycin reduced growth of clinical isolates of both gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and gentamicin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci to approximately 28%. To determine whether adding a second antibiotic has influence on the gentamicin release, cement blocks were placed in phosphate buffer and aliquots were taken at designated sampling intervals. The influence of the additional antibiotics was quantified by expressing the percentage released of the total amount of antibiotic incorporated in the different bone cements. After 3 days, all bone cements had released similar percentages of gentamicin, whereas more clindamycin and fusidic acid were released after doubling their concentration in the bone cements. In conclusion, bone cements loaded with combinations of gentamicin and clindamycin or fusidic acid are more effective in preventing biofilm formation than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. In addition, the presence of clindamycin or fusidic acid in gentamicin-loaded bone cement has no influence on the total gentamicin release.

Key concepts: Gentamicin, Fusidic acid, Clindamycin, Antibiotics, Bone cement, Microbiology, Staphylococcus aureus, Gentamicin Sulfate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gentamicin‐loaded bone cement with clindamycin or fusidic acid added: Biofilm formation and antibiotic release — Research Paper | ScholarLens