COMPARISON OF SOFT TISSUE HEALING AND OSSEOINTEGRATION OF IMZ IMPLANTS PLACED IN ONE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE TECHNIQUES
H. Dexter Barber, Robert J. Seckinger, Keith Silverstein, Khaled Abughazaleh
Abstract
H. Dexter Barber, Robert J. Seckinger, Keith Silverstein, Khaled Abughazaleh
Abstract
The osseointegration of endosseous dental implants is well documented. Implants have proven to be a viable treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth. The surgical phase of implant dentistry for most implant systems involves two stages--the placement of the implant and its subsequent uncovering. The IMZ (Interpore International) implant system is classically a two-stage system. No significant differences were demonstrated in osseointegration and soft tissue healing for IMZ implants placed in one-stage and two-stage procedures in this pilot study.
OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The osseointegration of endosseous dental implants is well documented. Implants have proven to be a viable treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth. The surgical phase of implant dentistry for most implant systems involves two stages--the placement of the implant and its subsequent uncovering. The IMZ (Interpore International) implant system is classically a two-stage system. No significant differences were demonstrated in osseointegration and soft tissue healing for IMZ implants placed in one-stage and two-stage procedures in this pilot study.
Key concepts: Osseointegration, Soft tissue, Implant, Dentistry, Stage (stratigraphy), Endosseous implants, Medicine, Surgery