Photosynthetic Induction Dynamics to Sunflecks of Four Deciduous Forest Understory Herbs with Different Phenologies
James C. Hull
Abstract
James C. Hull
Abstract
Photosynthetic responses to simulated sunflecks (lightflecks) were measured in four understory herbs with a continuum of phenologies (spring green: Erythronium americanum and Podophyllum peltatum; summer green: Arisaema triphyllum and Smilacina racemosa). A light response curve was measured under natural light for each species to quantify the PPFD at light saturation, light‐saturated photosynthetic rate, light compensation point, and dark respiration. Species were compared for the PPFD required to maintain photosynthetic induction. The loss of photosynthetic induction for the three most shade‐tolerant species was determined by measuring their photosynthetic response to lightflecks following different periods in noninducing conditions. Early spring herbs, e.g., E. americanum, responded as full‐sun plants with a higher light compensation point and greater net photosynthesis at light saturation. The PPFD required to maintain an induced photosynthetic state was significantly greater in spring‐green herbs than in summer‐green herbs. Smilacina racemosa and A. triphyllum maintained a high state of induction when exposed to PPFD characteristic of an eastern North American deciduous forest understory. The loss of photosynthetic induction differed among the species. Podophyllum peltatum and S. racemosa exhibited greater inductive loss corresponding to RuBP regeneration, while A. triphyllum exhibited greater inductive loss corresponding to Rubisco inhibition and to stomatal limitations. Therefore, understory herbs of different phenologies display different photosynthetic responses to sunfleck events.
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Photosynthetic responses to simulated sunflecks (lightflecks) were measured in four understory herbs with a continuum of phenologies (spring green: Erythronium americanum and Podophyllum peltatum; summer green: Arisaema triphyllum and Smilacina racemosa). A light response curve was measured under natural light for each species to quantify the PPFD at light saturation, light‐saturated photosynthetic rate, light compensation point, and dark respiration. Species were compared for the PPFD required to maintain photosynthetic induction. The loss of photosynthetic induction for the three most shade‐tolerant species was determined by measuring their photosynthetic response to lightflecks following different periods in noninducing conditions. Early spring herbs, e.g., E. americanum, responded as full‐sun plants with a higher light compensation point and greater net photosynthesis at light saturation. The PPFD required to maintain an induced photosynthetic state was significantly greater in spring‐green herbs than in summer‐green herbs. Smilacina racemosa and A. triphyllum maintained a high state of induction when exposed to PPFD characteristic of an eastern North American deciduous forest understory. The loss of photosynthetic induction differed among the species. Podophyllum peltatum and S. racemosa exhibited greater inductive loss corresponding to RuBP regeneration, while A. triphyllum exhibited greater inductive loss corresponding to Rubisco inhibition and to stomatal limitations. Therefore, understory herbs of different phenologies display different photosynthetic responses to sunfleck events.
Key concepts: Understory, Photosynthesis, Biology, Botany, Compensation point, Deciduous, Photosynthetic capacity, Horticulture