2012International Journal of Engine ResearchRequires access

Effects of gasoline–diesel and n-butanol–diesel blends on performance and emissions of an automotive direct-injection diesel engine

Gerardo Valentino, F. E. Corcione, Stefano Iannuzzi

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

In the present paper, results of an experimental investigation carried out in a modern diesel engine running at different operating conditions and fuelled with blends of gasoline–diesel and n-butanol–diesel, are reported. The exploration strategy was focused on the management of injection pressure and timing to achieve a condition in which the whole amount of fuel was delivered before ignition. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the effects of fuel blends, which have low cetane number (CN) and are more resistant to auto-ignition than diesel fuel, on performance and engine-out emissions. Blends were mixed by the baseline diesel (D00) with 40% of commercial unleaded gasoline (G40) and 40% of n-butanol (B40). Fuel consumption and engine-out gaseous and smoke emissions from fuel blends were measured and compared to the neat diesel fuel. The investigation was performed on a turbocharged, water-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine, equipped with a common-rail injection system. The engine equipment included an exhaust gas recirculation system controlled by an external driver, a piezo-quartz pressure transducer to detect the in-cylinder pressure signal and a current probe to acquire the energizing current to the injectors. Engine tests were carried out at two engine operating conditions: 2000 r/min at 0.5 MPa and 2500 r/min at 0.8 MPa brake mean effective pressure, exploring the effect of start of injection, O 2 concentration at intake and injection pressure on combustion behaviour and engine-out emissions. Taking advantages of the higher resistance of G40 and B40 to auto-ignition, it was possible to extend the range in which a partial premixed combustion was achieved. The management of injection pressure, O 2 concentration at intake and injection timing allowed partial premixed combustion to be obtained by extending the ignition delay, both for diesel fuel and blends. The longer ignition delay and the better mixing before combustion made more advanced injection timings, which reduced smoke and nitrogen oxide emissions, possible. The joint effect of higher resistance to auto-ignition and higher volatility of n-butanol and gasoline improved the emissions of the blends compared to the neat diesel fuel, with a low penalty on fuel consumption.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the present paper, results of an experimental investigation carried out in a modern diesel engine running at different operating conditions and fuelled with blends of gasoline–diesel and n-butanol–diesel, are reported. The exploration strategy was focused on the management of injection pressure and timing to achieve a condition in which the whole amount of fuel was delivered before ignition. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the effects of fuel blends, which have low cetane number (CN) and are more resistant to auto-ignition than diesel fuel, on performance and engine-out emissions. Blends were mixed by the baseline diesel (D00) with 40% of commercial unleaded gasoline (G40) and 40% of n-butanol (B40). Fuel consumption and engine-out gaseous and smoke emissions from fuel blends were measured and compared to the neat diesel fuel. The investigation was performed on a turbocharged, water-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine, equipped with a common-rail injection system. The engine equipment included an exhaust gas recirculation system controlled by an external driver, a piezo-quartz pressure transducer to detect the in-cylinder pressure signal and a current probe to acquire the energizing current to the injectors. Engine tests were carried out at two engine operating conditions: 2000 r/min at 0.5 MPa and 2500 r/min at 0.8 MPa brake mean effective pressure, exploring the effect of start of injection, O 2 concentration at intake and injection pressure on combustion behaviour and engine-out emissions. Taking advantages of the higher resistance of G40 and B40 to auto-ignition, it was possible to extend the range in which a partial premixed combustion was achieved. The management of injection pressure, O 2 concentration at intake and injection timing allowed partial premixed combustion to be obtained by extending the ignition delay, both for diesel fuel and blends. The longer ignition delay and the better mixing before combustion made more advanced injection timings, which reduced smoke and nitrogen oxide emissions, possible. The joint effect of higher resistance to auto-ignition and higher volatility of n-butanol and gasoline improved the emissions of the blends compared to the neat diesel fuel, with a low penalty on fuel consumption.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the present paper, results of an experimental investigation carried out in a modern diesel engine running at different operating conditions and fuelled with blends of gasoline–diesel and n-butanol–diesel, are reported. The exploration strategy was focused on the management of injection pressure and timing to achieve a condition in which the whole amount of fuel was delivered before ignition. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the effects of fuel blends, which have low cetane number (CN) and are more resistant to auto-ignition than diesel fuel, on performance and engine-out emissions. Blends were mixed by the baseline diesel (D00) with 40% of commercial unleaded gasoline (G40) and 40% of n-butanol (B40). Fuel consumption and engine-out gaseous and smoke emissions from fuel blends were measured and compared to the neat diesel fuel. The investigation was performed on a turbocharged, water-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine, equipped with a common-rail injection system. The engine equipment included an exhaust gas recirculation system controlled by an external driver, a piezo-quartz pressure transducer to detect the in-cylinder pressure signal and a current probe to acquire the energizing current to the injectors. Engine tests were carried out at two engine operating conditions: 2000 r/min at 0.5 MPa and 2500 r/min at 0.8 MPa brake mean effective pressure, exploring the effect of start of injection, O 2 concentration at intake and injection pressure on combustion behaviour and engine-out emissions. Taking advantages of the higher resistance of G40 and B40 to auto-ignition, it was possible to extend the range in which a partial premixed combustion was achieved. The management of injection pressure, O 2 concentration at intake and injection timing allowed partial premixed combustion to be obtained by extending the ignition delay, both for diesel fuel and blends. The longer ignition delay and the better mixing before combustion made more advanced injection timings, which reduced smoke and nitrogen oxide emissions, possible. The joint effect of higher resistance to auto-ignition and higher volatility of n-butanol and gasoline improved the emissions of the blends compared to the neat diesel fuel, with a low penalty on fuel consumption.

Key concepts: Diesel fuel, Cetane number, Diesel engine, Common rail, Automotive engineering, Mean effective pressure, Fuel injection, Diesel cycle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of gasoline–diesel and n-butanol–diesel blends on performance and emissions of an automotive direct-injection diesel engine — Research Paper | ScholarLens