1999Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part III Fundamental Electronic Science)Requires access

On generalized hyperbolic cascaded Reed-Solomon codes

Masazumi Kurihara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this paper, a generalized version of the Hyperbolic Cascaded Reed–Solomon (HCRS) code proposed by K. Saints and C. Heegard is considered. The lower bound of the minimum distance (the design distance) is investigated. This is a linear code that can be expressed as (n, k, d min = d ) on GF(q). Here, n, k, dmin, and d are the code length, dimension, minimum distance, and design distance, respectively. The proposed code has more degrees of freedom in selection of the code length than the HCRS code. Codes with various code length can be constructed easily. However, in the m-dimensional space on GF(q), the selectable code length is less than qm. When the proposed code with a code length less than qm is compared with the shortened code with the same code length obtained by shortening the m-dimensional HCRS code with a code length of qm [or (q−1)m], the design distances are identical, whereas the proposed code has an equal or greater dimension compared with the HCRS code. Also, from the proposed code, it is relatively easy to construct a code of the same code length as the algebraic geometric code (geometric Goppa code) and the improved geometric Goppa code proposed by Feng and Rao. Further, when the performance (parameters) is compared at a high coding rate (k/n), the proposed code sometimes has equal or better performance. © 1999 Scripta Technica, Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 82(11): 18–27, 1999

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, a generalized version of the Hyperbolic Cascaded Reed–Solomon (HCRS) code proposed by K. Saints and C. Heegard is considered. The lower bound of the minimum distance (the design distance) is investigated. This is a linear code that can be expressed as (n, k, d min = d ) on GF(q). Here, n, k, dmin, and d are the code length, dimension, minimum distance, and design distance, respectively. The proposed code has more degrees of freedom in selection of the code length than the HCRS code. Codes with various code length can be constructed easily. However, in the m-dimensional space on GF(q), the selectable code length is less than qm. When the proposed code with a code length less than qm is compared with the shortened code with the same code length obtained by shortening the m-dimensional HCRS code with a code length of qm [or (q−1)m], the design distances are identical, whereas the proposed code has an equal or greater dimension compared with the HCRS code. Also, from the proposed code, it is relatively easy to construct a code of the same code length as the algebraic geometric code (geometric Goppa code) and the improved geometric Goppa code proposed by Feng and Rao. Further, when the performance (parameters) is compared at a high coding rate (k/n), the proposed code sometimes has equal or better performance. © 1999 Scripta Technica, Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 82(11): 18–27, 1999

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, a generalized version of the Hyperbolic Cascaded Reed–Solomon (HCRS) code proposed by K. Saints and C. Heegard is considered. The lower bound of the minimum distance (the design distance) is investigated. This is a linear code that can be expressed as (n, k, d min = d ) on GF(q). Here, n, k, dmin, and d are the code length, dimension, minimum distance, and design distance, respectively. The proposed code has more degrees of freedom in selection of the code length than the HCRS code. Codes with various code length can be constructed easily. However, in the m-dimensional space on GF(q), the selectable code length is less than qm. When the proposed code with a code length less than qm is compared with the shortened code with the same code length obtained by shortening the m-dimensional HCRS code with a code length of qm [or (q−1)m], the design distances are identical, whereas the proposed code has an equal or greater dimension compared with the HCRS code. Also, from the proposed code, it is relatively easy to construct a code of the same code length as the algebraic geometric code (geometric Goppa code) and the improved geometric Goppa code proposed by Feng and Rao. Further, when the performance (parameters) is compared at a high coding rate (k/n), the proposed code sometimes has equal or better performance. © 1999 Scripta Technica, Electron Comm Jpn Pt 3, 82(11): 18–27, 1999

Key concepts: Constant-weight code, Polynomial code, Systematic code, Dual code, Cyclic code, Code (set theory), Code rate, Linear code

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On generalized hyperbolic cascaded Reed-Solomon codes — Research Paper | ScholarLens