2002•Small Wars and InsurgenciesRequires access

Battlespace Dynamics, Information Warfare to Netwar, and Bond-Relationship Targeting

Robert J. Bunker

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In the coming wars between nation-states and non-state entities, both traditional and advanced forms of weaponry and concepts will be employed. Increasingly, however, advanced forms of war-fighting will play a dominant role in counter-OPFOR (opposing force) strategies because of the new capabilities which they offer. Battlespace dynamics, information warfare to netwar, and bond-relationship targeting all represent viable strategies which can be utilized by nation-states against non-state entities. They are not stand alone solutions to combating networked OPFORs but rather can be combined with each other and with additional strategies based on developing urban CONOPS, nonlethal and hyperlethal weaponry, with better use of intelligence and planning prior to the engagement of hostilities, and with friendly C41 networks for operational support and direct operational impact in ‘not crime-not war’ operational environments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the coming wars between nation-states and non-state entities, both traditional and advanced forms of weaponry and concepts will be employed. Increasingly, however, advanced forms of war-fighting will play a dominant role in counter-OPFOR (opposing force) strategies because of the new capabilities which they offer. Battlespace dynamics, information warfare to netwar, and bond-relationship targeting all represent viable strategies which can be utilized by nation-states against non-state entities. They are not stand alone solutions to combating networked OPFORs but rather can be combined with each other and with additional strategies based on developing urban CONOPS, nonlethal and hyperlethal weaponry, with better use of intelligence and planning prior to the engagement of hostilities, and with friendly C41 networks for operational support and direct operational impact in ‘not crime-not war’ operational environments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the coming wars between nation-states and non-state entities, both traditional and advanced forms of weaponry and concepts will be employed. Increasingly, however, advanced forms of war-fighting will play a dominant role in counter-OPFOR (opposing force) strategies because of the new capabilities which they offer. Battlespace dynamics, information warfare to netwar, and bond-relationship targeting all represent viable strategies which can be utilized by nation-states against non-state entities. They are not stand alone solutions to combating networked OPFORs but rather can be combined with each other and with additional strategies based on developing urban CONOPS, nonlethal and hyperlethal weaponry, with better use of intelligence and planning prior to the engagement of hostilities, and with friendly C41 networks for operational support and direct operational impact in ‘not crime-not war’ operational environments.

Key concepts: Battlespace, Information warfare, Network-centric warfare, State (computer science), Military strategy, Computer security, Operations research, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Battlespace Dynamics, Information Warfare to Netwar, and Bond-Relationship Targeting — Research Paper | ScholarLens