Relationship between downside risk and return: new evidence through a multiscaling approach
Don U. A. Galagedera, Elizabeth Ann Maharaj, Robert C. Brooks
Abstract
Don U. A. Galagedera, Elizabeth Ann Maharaj, Robert C. Brooks
Abstract
In the multiscaling approach, a time series is decomposed into different time horizons referred to as timescales. In this article, we investigate the risk–return relationship in a downside framework using timescales. Two measures of downside risk; downside beta and downside co-skewness are investigated. A sample of Australian industry portfolios does not reveal a positive linear relationship between downside beta and portfolio return. At a high timescale where dynamics over a longer horizon (32–64 days) is captured, a positive linear association between downside co-skewness and portfolio return is observed. Overall, our results suggest that when investigating the validity of asset pricing models whether in the downside framework or in the traditional mean-variance framework, it may be prudent to consider other horizons in addition to the usual daily and monthly frequencies.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the multiscaling approach, a time series is decomposed into different time horizons referred to as timescales. In this article, we investigate the risk–return relationship in a downside framework using timescales. Two measures of downside risk; downside beta and downside co-skewness are investigated. A sample of Australian industry portfolios does not reveal a positive linear relationship between downside beta and portfolio return. At a high timescale where dynamics over a longer horizon (32–64 days) is captured, a positive linear association between downside co-skewness and portfolio return is observed. Overall, our results suggest that when investigating the validity of asset pricing models whether in the downside framework or in the traditional mean-variance framework, it may be prudent to consider other horizons in addition to the usual daily and monthly frequencies.
Key concepts: Downside risk, Economics, Econometrics, Financial economics, Risk–return spectrum, Portfolio