1973Archives of Disease in ChildhoodOpen access

Comparative efficacy of nalidixic acid and ampicillin for severe shigellosis

Kenneth C. Haltalin, John D. Nelson, Helen Kusmiesz

Open full text 49 citations

Abstract

Nalidixic acid is effective in vitro against shigellae including strains multiply-resistant to antibiotics. A comparative study of acute shigellosis in infants and children involved 19 patients treated with ampicillin and 17 treated with nalidixic acid. Stool cultures remained positive longer with nalidixic acid treatment than with ampicillin therapy, and clinical response was slower. The rate of response to therapy was correlated with the serum levels of ampicillin. Though nalidixic acid eliminates shigellae from stools more rapidly than with symptomatic therapy alone, it cannot be recommended for routine treatment of acute shigellosis since it has little effect on the natural course of the illness. In special circumstances when dealing with shigellae that are resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid may have a limited use.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nalidixic acid is effective in vitro against shigellae including strains multiply-resistant to antibiotics. A comparative study of acute shigellosis in infants and children involved 19 patients treated with ampicillin and 17 treated with nalidixic acid. Stool cultures remained positive longer with nalidixic acid treatment than with ampicillin therapy, and clinical response was slower. The rate of response to therapy was correlated with the serum levels of ampicillin. Though nalidixic acid eliminates shigellae from stools more rapidly than with symptomatic therapy alone, it cannot be recommended for routine treatment of acute shigellosis since it has little effect on the natural course of the illness. In special circumstances when dealing with shigellae that are resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid may have a limited use.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nalidixic acid is effective in vitro against shigellae including strains multiply-resistant to antibiotics. A comparative study of acute shigellosis in infants and children involved 19 patients treated with ampicillin and 17 treated with nalidixic acid. Stool cultures remained positive longer with nalidixic acid treatment than with ampicillin therapy, and clinical response was slower. The rate of response to therapy was correlated with the serum levels of ampicillin. Though nalidixic acid eliminates shigellae from stools more rapidly than with symptomatic therapy alone, it cannot be recommended for routine treatment of acute shigellosis since it has little effect on the natural course of the illness. In special circumstances when dealing with shigellae that are resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid may have a limited use.

Key concepts: Nalidixic acid, Shigellosis, Ampicillin, Medicine, Antibiotics, Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative efficacy of nalidixic acid and ampicillin for severe shigellosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens