1999•Unpublished venueRequires access

Evisceration after Abdominal Stab Wounds: Is Laparotomy Required?

Kimberly K. Nagy, Roxanne Roberts, Kimberly T. Joseph, Gary, John A. Barrett

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy after an abdominal stab wound with evisceration. To identify clinical signs that increase the likelihood of an intra-abdominal injury in the presence of such a wound. METHODS: Information was collected prospectively over an 8-year period on all patients who presented to our urban level I trauma center with an abdominal stab wound and evisceration. This information included which organ eviscerated, presence of other indications for laparotomy, organs injured, and postoperative complications. All comparisons used the Fisher's exact chi2. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were admitted with evisceration after an abdominal stab wound. Sixty-one patients (75%) had eviscerated omentum, 18 patients (22%) had eviscerated small bowel, and 2 patients (2%) had eviscerated colon. Sixty-two patients (76%) had evisceration as the sole indication for laparotomy, the remaining 19 patients (24%) had another indication such as hypotension or peritonitis. Overall, 63 patients (78%) had an intra-abdominal injury that required repair. This was true regardless of organ eviscerated (omentum = 77% vs. viscus = 80%, not significant) or clinical presentation (no other indication = 76% vs. another indication = 84%, not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who present with an evisceration after a stab wound to the abdomen require a laparotomy. This is true regardless of what has eviscerated or the presence of other clinical indications to operate. Evisceration should continue to prompt operative intervention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy after an abdominal stab wound with evisceration. To identify clinical signs that increase the likelihood of an intra-abdominal injury in the presence of such a wound. METHODS: Information was collected prospectively over an 8-year period on all patients who presented to our urban level I trauma center with an abdominal stab wound and evisceration. This information included which organ eviscerated, presence of other indications for laparotomy, organs injured, and postoperative complications. All comparisons used the Fisher's exact chi2. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were admitted with evisceration after an abdominal stab wound. Sixty-one patients (75%) had eviscerated omentum, 18 patients (22%) had eviscerated small bowel, and 2 patients (2%) had eviscerated colon. Sixty-two patients (76%) had evisceration as the sole indication for laparotomy, the remaining 19 patients (24%) had another indication such as hypotension or peritonitis. Overall, 63 patients (78%) had an intra-abdominal injury that required repair. This was true regardless of organ eviscerated (omentum = 77% vs. viscus = 80%, not significant) or clinical presentation (no other indication = 76% vs. another indication = 84%, not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who present with an evisceration after a stab wound to the abdomen require a laparotomy. This is true regardless of what has eviscerated or the presence of other clinical indications to operate. Evisceration should continue to prompt operative intervention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy after an abdominal stab wound with evisceration. To identify clinical signs that increase the likelihood of an intra-abdominal injury in the presence of such a wound. METHODS: Information was collected prospectively over an 8-year period on all patients who presented to our urban level I trauma center with an abdominal stab wound and evisceration. This information included which organ eviscerated, presence of other indications for laparotomy, organs injured, and postoperative complications. All comparisons used the Fisher's exact chi2. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were admitted with evisceration after an abdominal stab wound. Sixty-one patients (75%) had eviscerated omentum, 18 patients (22%) had eviscerated small bowel, and 2 patients (2%) had eviscerated colon. Sixty-two patients (76%) had evisceration as the sole indication for laparotomy, the remaining 19 patients (24%) had another indication such as hypotension or peritonitis. Overall, 63 patients (78%) had an intra-abdominal injury that required repair. This was true regardless of organ eviscerated (omentum = 77% vs. viscus = 80%, not significant) or clinical presentation (no other indication = 76% vs. another indication = 84%, not significant). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who present with an evisceration after a stab wound to the abdomen require a laparotomy. This is true regardless of what has eviscerated or the presence of other clinical indications to operate. Evisceration should continue to prompt operative intervention.

Key concepts: Evisceration (ophthalmology), Medicine, Laparotomy, Surgery, Stab wound, Abdomen, Stab, Alternative medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evisceration after Abdominal Stab Wounds: Is Laparotomy Required? — Research Paper | ScholarLens