Ancient Scepticism. By Harald Thorsrud. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009. Pp. 248 + xvi. ISBN: 978-0-520-26026-9.
Filip Grgić
Abstract
Filip Grgić
Abstract
It is a very difficult task to write a comprehensive account of ancient Scepticism. On the one hand, this is because there is in fact no such thing as ancient Scepticism as a unified philosophical movement. The term “ancient Scepticism” refers to the period of several centuries, during which the ideas of two sceptical schools—Pyrrhonism and Academic Scepticism—underwent modifications and developments that are not easily traceable. Moreover, the differences and mutual influence between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics are very complicated and in some important respects obscure. On the other hand, the ancient Sceptics’ views on what Scepticism is and
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is a very difficult task to write a comprehensive account of ancient Scepticism. On the one hand, this is because there is in fact no such thing as ancient Scepticism as a unified philosophical movement. The term “ancient Scepticism” refers to the period of several centuries, during which the ideas of two sceptical schools—Pyrrhonism and Academic Scepticism—underwent modifications and developments that are not easily traceable. Moreover, the differences and mutual influence between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics are very complicated and in some important respects obscure. On the other hand, the ancient Sceptics’ views on what Scepticism is and
Key concepts: Skepticism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Classics, Environmental ethics, History