1977 procedural amendments to the Clean Air Act - have they made a difference
Eileen Paez
Abstract
Open-access reader
Eileen Paez
Abstract
Open-access reader
The purpose of the 1977 Procedural Amendments to the Clean Air Act was to insure consistent policy and legal interpretation by the regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A review of subsequent court cases shows that the amendments have not caused the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to give more deference to EPA decisions. The evidence suggests that the court is taking an even harder look, although it is not ready to take a firm stand on what its review standard should be. 115 references.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of the 1977 Procedural Amendments to the Clean Air Act was to insure consistent policy and legal interpretation by the regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A review of subsequent court cases shows that the amendments have not caused the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to give more deference to EPA decisions. The evidence suggests that the court is taking an even harder look, although it is not ready to take a firm stand on what its review standard should be. 115 references.
Key concepts: Clean Air Act, Deference, Agency (philosophy), Law, Interpretation (philosophy), Statutory interpretation, Political science, Standard of review