2009•EnvironmetricsRequires access

Semiparametric penalized generalized additive models for environmental research and epidemiology

Michael G. Schimek

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

Abstract For more than a decade generalized additive models (GAMs) have been successfully applied in various environmental studies, for instance to evaluate the impact of air pollution on health. The air pollution measure is usually connected with the health indicator in a parametric fashion whilst the effects of other covariates are modelled through nonparametric smooth functions. This is the motivation for the widely used semiparametric GAMs. The backfitting‐GAM methodology, and its popular implementation in S‐Plus, constitutes the standard approach. Here we consider its limitations and offer an alternative penalized likelihood concept. The primary limitations are the lack of tools for multiple data‐driven smoothing parameter choice, slow convergence of the iterative backfitting algorithm when concurvity is present, and unstable biased estimates of the regression coefficients and their standard errors in the semiparametric case, even more pronounced under concurvity. The penalized likelihood methodology when combined with cubic spline smoothers allows for a computationally efficient and complete parametric representation of a GAM, either nonparametric or semiparametric. It helps circumvent most of the mentioned GAM flaws in environmental research and epidemiology (e.g. in studies of human exposure to particulate matter). Finally, we discuss various evidence from simulation experiments in the literature, concerning the proper use of the GAM methodology. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract For more than a decade generalized additive models (GAMs) have been successfully applied in various environmental studies, for instance to evaluate the impact of air pollution on health. The air pollution measure is usually connected with the health indicator in a parametric fashion whilst the effects of other covariates are modelled through nonparametric smooth functions. This is the motivation for the widely used semiparametric GAMs. The backfitting‐GAM methodology, and its popular implementation in S‐Plus, constitutes the standard approach. Here we consider its limitations and offer an alternative penalized likelihood concept. The primary limitations are the lack of tools for multiple data‐driven smoothing parameter choice, slow convergence of the iterative backfitting algorithm when concurvity is present, and unstable biased estimates of the regression coefficients and their standard errors in the semiparametric case, even more pronounced under concurvity. The penalized likelihood methodology when combined with cubic spline smoothers allows for a computationally efficient and complete parametric representation of a GAM, either nonparametric or semiparametric. It helps circumvent most of the mentioned GAM flaws in environmental research and epidemiology (e.g. in studies of human exposure to particulate matter). Finally, we discuss various evidence from simulation experiments in the literature, concerning the proper use of the GAM methodology. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract For more than a decade generalized additive models (GAMs) have been successfully applied in various environmental studies, for instance to evaluate the impact of air pollution on health. The air pollution measure is usually connected with the health indicator in a parametric fashion whilst the effects of other covariates are modelled through nonparametric smooth functions. This is the motivation for the widely used semiparametric GAMs. The backfitting‐GAM methodology, and its popular implementation in S‐Plus, constitutes the standard approach. Here we consider its limitations and offer an alternative penalized likelihood concept. The primary limitations are the lack of tools for multiple data‐driven smoothing parameter choice, slow convergence of the iterative backfitting algorithm when concurvity is present, and unstable biased estimates of the regression coefficients and their standard errors in the semiparametric case, even more pronounced under concurvity. The penalized likelihood methodology when combined with cubic spline smoothers allows for a computationally efficient and complete parametric representation of a GAM, either nonparametric or semiparametric. It helps circumvent most of the mentioned GAM flaws in environmental research and epidemiology (e.g. in studies of human exposure to particulate matter). Finally, we discuss various evidence from simulation experiments in the literature, concerning the proper use of the GAM methodology. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Generalized additive model, Semiparametric regression, Additive model, Nonparametric statistics, Econometrics, Semiparametric model, Covariate, Parametric statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Semiparametric penalized generalized additive models for environmental research and epidemiology — Research Paper | ScholarLens