Ischemic preconditioning: Lack of delayed protection against skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion
Diana A. Lepore, Wayne A. Morrison
Abstract
Diana A. Lepore, Wayne A. Morrison
Abstract
We investigated the ability of ischemic preconditioning to induce expression of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp 70) and/or to increase muscle survival after ischemia-reperfusion in the rat hind limb. Ischemic preconditioning regimens tested were; 1 x 5 min of ischemia, 4 x 5 min of ischemia interrupted by 10 min of reperfusion, 1 x 10 min of ischemia or 2 x 10 min of ischemia interrupted by 15 min of reperfusion. Western blot analysis revealed only a modest induction of Hsp 70 at 24 h after preconditioning using the latter two protocols of 1 x 10 min of ischemia or 2 x 10 min. Used at 24 h prior to prolonged ischemia, neither protocol improved muscle survival measured at 24 h after reperfusion. In conclusion, ischemic preconditioning did not produce delayed protection from ischemia-reperfusion in this model and the study suggests that ischemic preconditioning is not a useful protective strategy against skeletal muscle necrosis in the long-term.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigated the ability of ischemic preconditioning to induce expression of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp 70) and/or to increase muscle survival after ischemia-reperfusion in the rat hind limb. Ischemic preconditioning regimens tested were; 1 x 5 min of ischemia, 4 x 5 min of ischemia interrupted by 10 min of reperfusion, 1 x 10 min of ischemia or 2 x 10 min of ischemia interrupted by 15 min of reperfusion. Western blot analysis revealed only a modest induction of Hsp 70 at 24 h after preconditioning using the latter two protocols of 1 x 10 min of ischemia or 2 x 10 min. Used at 24 h prior to prolonged ischemia, neither protocol improved muscle survival measured at 24 h after reperfusion. In conclusion, ischemic preconditioning did not produce delayed protection from ischemia-reperfusion in this model and the study suggests that ischemic preconditioning is not a useful protective strategy against skeletal muscle necrosis in the long-term.
Key concepts: Ischemia, Medicine, Ischemic preconditioning, Skeletal muscle, Reperfusion injury, Western blot, Anesthesia, Hindlimb