2013IET Power ElectronicsRequires access

Cascaded cross‐switched multilevel inverter in symmetric and asymmetric conditions

Mohammad Farhadi‐Kangarlu, Ebrahim Babaei, Mehran Sabahi

Open publisher page 102 citations

Abstract

This study proposes and analyses a new cascaded multilevel inverter in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions. Firstly, the topology is presented in general form and then it is optimised. For any given number of voltage levels, the proposed topology reduces the number of switches. In the symmetric condition, the proposed topology offers capability of charge balance control method while reducing the number of switches. Also, unlike the other reduced switch topologies, the proposed topology does not increase the total standing voltage of the switches in comparison with the conventional cascaded H‐bridge (CHB) multilevel inverter. In the asymmetric condition, the proposed topology has highest output voltage resolution while keeping the total standing voltage equal to the CHB topology. In other words, in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions the number of switches in the proposed topology is lower than that of the CHB topology. However, both the proposed topology and also the CHB topology have the same total standing voltage on the switches. Other asymmetric topologies use higher number of switches and have higher total standing voltage in comparison with the proposed asymmetric topology. A modified phase‐shifted‐pulse width modulation is also presented for the proposed symmetric topology. The proposed topology is verified with simulation and experimental results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study proposes and analyses a new cascaded multilevel inverter in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions. Firstly, the topology is presented in general form and then it is optimised. For any given number of voltage levels, the proposed topology reduces the number of switches. In the symmetric condition, the proposed topology offers capability of charge balance control method while reducing the number of switches. Also, unlike the other reduced switch topologies, the proposed topology does not increase the total standing voltage of the switches in comparison with the conventional cascaded H‐bridge (CHB) multilevel inverter. In the asymmetric condition, the proposed topology has highest output voltage resolution while keeping the total standing voltage equal to the CHB topology. In other words, in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions the number of switches in the proposed topology is lower than that of the CHB topology. However, both the proposed topology and also the CHB topology have the same total standing voltage on the switches. Other asymmetric topologies use higher number of switches and have higher total standing voltage in comparison with the proposed asymmetric topology. A modified phase‐shifted‐pulse width modulation is also presented for the proposed symmetric topology. The proposed topology is verified with simulation and experimental results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 102 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study proposes and analyses a new cascaded multilevel inverter in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions. Firstly, the topology is presented in general form and then it is optimised. For any given number of voltage levels, the proposed topology reduces the number of switches. In the symmetric condition, the proposed topology offers capability of charge balance control method while reducing the number of switches. Also, unlike the other reduced switch topologies, the proposed topology does not increase the total standing voltage of the switches in comparison with the conventional cascaded H‐bridge (CHB) multilevel inverter. In the asymmetric condition, the proposed topology has highest output voltage resolution while keeping the total standing voltage equal to the CHB topology. In other words, in both symmetric and asymmetric conditions the number of switches in the proposed topology is lower than that of the CHB topology. However, both the proposed topology and also the CHB topology have the same total standing voltage on the switches. Other asymmetric topologies use higher number of switches and have higher total standing voltage in comparison with the proposed asymmetric topology. A modified phase‐shifted‐pulse width modulation is also presented for the proposed symmetric topology. The proposed topology is verified with simulation and experimental results.

Key concepts: Topology (electrical circuits), Network topology, Voltage, Extension topology, Pulse-width modulation, Weak topology (polar topology), Inverter, Comparison of topologies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cascaded cross‐switched multilevel inverter in symmetric and asymmetric conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens