2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Non-Upwind Versus Upwind Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Porous Media

Michael G. Edwards

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Standard reservoir simulation schemes employ upstream weighting approximations of the multi-phase/multi-component convective fluxes. The upstream definition depends upon the direction of the local phase velocities. This paper presents novel convective flow approximation schemes in a non-upwind finite volume framework, which avoids both upwinding and characteristic decomposition, leading to a fundamental simplification of current methods. Stable lower order and higher order monotonicity preserving non-upwind approximations are developed. The schemes are locally conservative and the formulation is consistent in IMPES mode (or sequentially implicit mode), with respect to sign change in wave velocity and mass balance. Comparisons between velocity upwinding and the non-upwind schemes are presented for gravity segregated flow problems where waves undergo sign changes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Standard reservoir simulation schemes employ upstream weighting approximations of the multi-phase/multi-component convective fluxes. The upstream definition depends upon the direction of the local phase velocities. This paper presents novel convective flow approximation schemes in a non-upwind finite volume framework, which avoids both upwinding and characteristic decomposition, leading to a fundamental simplification of current methods. Stable lower order and higher order monotonicity preserving non-upwind approximations are developed. The schemes are locally conservative and the formulation is consistent in IMPES mode (or sequentially implicit mode), with respect to sign change in wave velocity and mass balance. Comparisons between velocity upwinding and the non-upwind schemes are presented for gravity segregated flow problems where waves undergo sign changes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Standard reservoir simulation schemes employ upstream weighting approximations of the multi-phase/multi-component convective fluxes. The upstream definition depends upon the direction of the local phase velocities. This paper presents novel convective flow approximation schemes in a non-upwind finite volume framework, which avoids both upwinding and characteristic decomposition, leading to a fundamental simplification of current methods. Stable lower order and higher order monotonicity preserving non-upwind approximations are developed. The schemes are locally conservative and the formulation is consistent in IMPES mode (or sequentially implicit mode), with respect to sign change in wave velocity and mass balance. Comparisons between velocity upwinding and the non-upwind schemes are presented for gravity segregated flow problems where waves undergo sign changes.

Key concepts: Upwind scheme, Conservation law, Mathematics, Finite volume method, Weighting, Applied mathematics, Flow (mathematics), Mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-Upwind Versus Upwind Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Porous Media — Research Paper | ScholarLens