Illuminating imperfections of imaging inversion
Christof Stork
Abstract
Christof Stork
Abstract
Various types of imaging inversion are of significant benefit for extracting subtle information from seismic data. But the methods are can produce significant errors in some situations. We present several examples of imaging inversion imperfections that illuminate how one must be careful with inversion. We suggest methods to analyze the reliability of inversion. We propose that using these methods to produce reliability& uncertainty information from inversion can be as important as the inversion result itself. Our examples are from sparsity inversion signal enhancement, imaging illumination compensation, velocity inversion, and impedance inversion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Various types of imaging inversion are of significant benefit for extracting subtle information from seismic data. But the methods are can produce significant errors in some situations. We present several examples of imaging inversion imperfections that illuminate how one must be careful with inversion. We suggest methods to analyze the reliability of inversion. We propose that using these methods to produce reliability& uncertainty information from inversion can be as important as the inversion result itself. Our examples are from sparsity inversion signal enhancement, imaging illumination compensation, velocity inversion, and impedance inversion.
Key concepts: Inversion (geology), Computer science, Geology, Seismology, Tectonics