2013Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparison Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies

Babak Darvish Rouhani, Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin, Fatemeh Nikpay, Pourya Nikfard

Open publisher page 65 citations

Abstract

A number of methodologies for implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) have been proposed in the literature. Understanding methodologies' strengths and weaknesses play significant role in selecting appropriate methodology for each EA project. This paper reviews five EA implementation methodologies including: EAP, TOGAF, DODAF, Gartner, and FEA and compare them based on designed framework. Comparison framework is designed based on concepts, modeling, and processes criteria. This comparison provides vast information about selected methodologies based on defined criteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of methodologies for implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) have been proposed in the literature. Understanding methodologies' strengths and weaknesses play significant role in selecting appropriate methodology for each EA project. This paper reviews five EA implementation methodologies including: EAP, TOGAF, DODAF, Gartner, and FEA and compare them based on designed framework. Comparison framework is designed based on concepts, modeling, and processes criteria. This comparison provides vast information about selected methodologies based on defined criteria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of methodologies for implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) have been proposed in the literature. Understanding methodologies' strengths and weaknesses play significant role in selecting appropriate methodology for each EA project. This paper reviews five EA implementation methodologies including: EAP, TOGAF, DODAF, Gartner, and FEA and compare them based on designed framework. Comparison framework is designed based on concepts, modeling, and processes criteria. This comparison provides vast information about selected methodologies based on defined criteria.

Key concepts: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Enterprise architecture, Computer science, Strengths and weaknesses, Architecture framework, View model, Software engineering, Enterprise architecture framework

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies — Research Paper | ScholarLens