A Comparison Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies
Babak Darvish Rouhani, Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin, Fatemeh Nikpay, Pourya Nikfard
Abstract
Babak Darvish Rouhani, Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin, Fatemeh Nikpay, Pourya Nikfard
Abstract
A number of methodologies for implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) have been proposed in the literature. Understanding methodologies' strengths and weaknesses play significant role in selecting appropriate methodology for each EA project. This paper reviews five EA implementation methodologies including: EAP, TOGAF, DODAF, Gartner, and FEA and compare them based on designed framework. Comparison framework is designed based on concepts, modeling, and processes criteria. This comparison provides vast information about selected methodologies based on defined criteria.
OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A number of methodologies for implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) have been proposed in the literature. Understanding methodologies' strengths and weaknesses play significant role in selecting appropriate methodology for each EA project. This paper reviews five EA implementation methodologies including: EAP, TOGAF, DODAF, Gartner, and FEA and compare them based on designed framework. Comparison framework is designed based on concepts, modeling, and processes criteria. This comparison provides vast information about selected methodologies based on defined criteria.
Key concepts: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Enterprise architecture, Computer science, Strengths and weaknesses, Architecture framework, View model, Software engineering, Enterprise architecture framework