2002The LaryngoscopeOpen access

Compositional Difference in Middle Ear Effusion: Mucous Versus Serous

Myung‐Hyun Chung, Jae Young Choi, Won‐Sang Lee, Hee‐Nam Kim, Joo‐Heon Yoon

Open full text 60 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Serous otitis media is usually responsive to medical treatment, whereas mucoid otitis media is not. The present study was undertaken to elucidate the compositional difference between serous and mucoid effusion and to investigate whether MUC5AC acts as a major mucin in the middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a chemical analysis of middle ear effusion and immunostaining of the middle ear mucosa. METHODS: Middle ear effusion samples were collected from 27 patients with mucoid otitis media and 18 patients with serous otitis media. The levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 were measured by dot blotting or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Periodic acid-Schiff and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal anti-MUC5AC antibody were performed on the serial sections of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. RESULTS: Mucoid effusions contained higher levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 than did serous effusions. Immunohistological study revealed that MUC5AC mucin was expressed in only a small portion of the goblet cells of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that both serous secretions and mucin might make the middle ear effusion more viscous and that mucins other than MUC5AC might have a major role in the viscosity of middle ear effusion. Further study is necessary to identify the major mucins in the middle ear effusion of otitis media with effusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Serous otitis media is usually responsive to medical treatment, whereas mucoid otitis media is not. The present study was undertaken to elucidate the compositional difference between serous and mucoid effusion and to investigate whether MUC5AC acts as a major mucin in the middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a chemical analysis of middle ear effusion and immunostaining of the middle ear mucosa. METHODS: Middle ear effusion samples were collected from 27 patients with mucoid otitis media and 18 patients with serous otitis media. The levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 were measured by dot blotting or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Periodic acid-Schiff and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal anti-MUC5AC antibody were performed on the serial sections of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. RESULTS: Mucoid effusions contained higher levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 than did serous effusions. Immunohistological study revealed that MUC5AC mucin was expressed in only a small portion of the goblet cells of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that both serous secretions and mucin might make the middle ear effusion more viscous and that mucins other than MUC5AC might have a major role in the viscosity of middle ear effusion. Further study is necessary to identify the major mucins in the middle ear effusion of otitis media with effusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 60 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Serous otitis media is usually responsive to medical treatment, whereas mucoid otitis media is not. The present study was undertaken to elucidate the compositional difference between serous and mucoid effusion and to investigate whether MUC5AC acts as a major mucin in the middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a chemical analysis of middle ear effusion and immunostaining of the middle ear mucosa. METHODS: Middle ear effusion samples were collected from 27 patients with mucoid otitis media and 18 patients with serous otitis media. The levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 were measured by dot blotting or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Periodic acid-Schiff and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal anti-MUC5AC antibody were performed on the serial sections of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. RESULTS: Mucoid effusions contained higher levels of mucin, lysozyme, secretory immunoglobulin A, and interleukin-8 than did serous effusions. Immunohistological study revealed that MUC5AC mucin was expressed in only a small portion of the goblet cells of middle ear mucosa with mucoid otitis media. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that both serous secretions and mucin might make the middle ear effusion more viscous and that mucins other than MUC5AC might have a major role in the viscosity of middle ear effusion. Further study is necessary to identify the major mucins in the middle ear effusion of otitis media with effusion.

Key concepts: Serous fluid, Otitis, Effusion, Mucin, Middle ear, Pathology, Medicine, Goblet cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compositional Difference in Middle Ear Effusion: Mucous Versus Serous — Research Paper | ScholarLens