1996Journal of Biopharmaceutical StatisticsRequires access

False-positive error rates in routine application of repeated measurements ANOVA

John E. Overall, Suzanne R. Doyle

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Failure to recognize the serious implications of heterogeneous correlations and disregard of the multiple test problem in interpreting the results from repeated measurements ANOVA of any single primary outcome measure can produce false-positive error rates that are more than five times the alpha level that is reported. Alternative analyses that do not depend on the symmetry assumption, together with a Bonferroni correction of the multiple tests of significance that are routinely accomplished by the repeated measurements ANOVA, appropriately control the probability of statistical support for a false-positive claim. The magnitudes of error inflation and appropriate procedures for error control are examined in this article using simulated clinical trials data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Failure to recognize the serious implications of heterogeneous correlations and disregard of the multiple test problem in interpreting the results from repeated measurements ANOVA of any single primary outcome measure can produce false-positive error rates that are more than five times the alpha level that is reported. Alternative analyses that do not depend on the symmetry assumption, together with a Bonferroni correction of the multiple tests of significance that are routinely accomplished by the repeated measurements ANOVA, appropriately control the probability of statistical support for a false-positive claim. The magnitudes of error inflation and appropriate procedures for error control are examined in this article using simulated clinical trials data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Failure to recognize the serious implications of heterogeneous correlations and disregard of the multiple test problem in interpreting the results from repeated measurements ANOVA of any single primary outcome measure can produce false-positive error rates that are more than five times the alpha level that is reported. Alternative analyses that do not depend on the symmetry assumption, together with a Bonferroni correction of the multiple tests of significance that are routinely accomplished by the repeated measurements ANOVA, appropriately control the probability of statistical support for a false-positive claim. The magnitudes of error inflation and appropriate procedures for error control are examined in this article using simulated clinical trials data.

Key concepts: Bonferroni correction, Repeated measures design, Statistics, Analysis of variance, Type I and type II errors, Multiple comparisons problem, Mathematics, Statistical hypothesis testing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
False-positive error rates in routine application of repeated measurements ANOVA — Research Paper | ScholarLens