2011PubMedRequires access

[Treatment of chronic anal fissures: diltiazem or isosorbide dinitrate as first choice?].

Eveline B. Boeker, M J P Marjan Kruijer, Paul C.M. Verbeek

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Chronic anal fissures are a painful condition frequently seen in general practice, with an incidence of 2,5/1000 per year. According to the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, isosorbide dinitrate 1% ointment (ISDN) is the treatment of first choice for chronic anal fissures. Systemic side-effects such as headache are reported in 27% of all cases. This side effect in combination with the frequent application of ISDN (4-6 times daily) leads to a low compliance for this therapy. A meta-analysis of the Cochrane Collaboration showed similar efficacy of diltiazem compared to ISDN. Diltiazem has several advantages: the application frequency is only twice daily, no systemic side-effects have been reported, the total costs of treatment are lower than the costs of ISDN and a standard preparation of diltiazem ointment is available. Therefore, diltiazem 2% ointment should be the first line treatment for chronic anal fissures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chronic anal fissures are a painful condition frequently seen in general practice, with an incidence of 2,5/1000 per year. According to the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, isosorbide dinitrate 1% ointment (ISDN) is the treatment of first choice for chronic anal fissures. Systemic side-effects such as headache are reported in 27% of all cases. This side effect in combination with the frequent application of ISDN (4-6 times daily) leads to a low compliance for this therapy. A meta-analysis of the Cochrane Collaboration showed similar efficacy of diltiazem compared to ISDN. Diltiazem has several advantages: the application frequency is only twice daily, no systemic side-effects have been reported, the total costs of treatment are lower than the costs of ISDN and a standard preparation of diltiazem ointment is available. Therefore, diltiazem 2% ointment should be the first line treatment for chronic anal fissures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chronic anal fissures are a painful condition frequently seen in general practice, with an incidence of 2,5/1000 per year. According to the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, isosorbide dinitrate 1% ointment (ISDN) is the treatment of first choice for chronic anal fissures. Systemic side-effects such as headache are reported in 27% of all cases. This side effect in combination with the frequent application of ISDN (4-6 times daily) leads to a low compliance for this therapy. A meta-analysis of the Cochrane Collaboration showed similar efficacy of diltiazem compared to ISDN. Diltiazem has several advantages: the application frequency is only twice daily, no systemic side-effects have been reported, the total costs of treatment are lower than the costs of ISDN and a standard preparation of diltiazem ointment is available. Therefore, diltiazem 2% ointment should be the first line treatment for chronic anal fissures.

Key concepts: Diltiazem, Isosorbide dinitrate, Medicine, Side effect (computer science), Incidence (geometry), Surgery, Anesthesia, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Treatment of chronic anal fissures: diltiazem or isosorbide dinitrate as first choice?]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens