2000International Journal of Children s SpiritualityRequires access

Whose Model of Spirituality Should Be Used in the Spiritual Development of School Children?

Jacqueline Watson

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

This paper explores ten personal descriptions of spirituality collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with people from across a range of religious and non-religious backgrounds. It examines some of the commonalties and differences of understanding within those descriptions. It argues that the interviewees' descriptions of spirituality were essentially diverse because each was grounded in the beliefs of the individual. The paper further argues that education for spiritual development tends to ignore diversity in understandings of spirituality. Instead education for spiritual development currently favours a naturalistic, or secular humanist model of spirituality based in shared human experience. The paper concludes that a recognition of diversity in understandings of spirituality should call into question the validity of education for spiritual development in state schools, where the acceptance of plurality of beliefs must be paramount.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores ten personal descriptions of spirituality collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with people from across a range of religious and non-religious backgrounds. It examines some of the commonalties and differences of understanding within those descriptions. It argues that the interviewees' descriptions of spirituality were essentially diverse because each was grounded in the beliefs of the individual. The paper further argues that education for spiritual development tends to ignore diversity in understandings of spirituality. Instead education for spiritual development currently favours a naturalistic, or secular humanist model of spirituality based in shared human experience. The paper concludes that a recognition of diversity in understandings of spirituality should call into question the validity of education for spiritual development in state schools, where the acceptance of plurality of beliefs must be paramount.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores ten personal descriptions of spirituality collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with people from across a range of religious and non-religious backgrounds. It examines some of the commonalties and differences of understanding within those descriptions. It argues that the interviewees' descriptions of spirituality were essentially diverse because each was grounded in the beliefs of the individual. The paper further argues that education for spiritual development tends to ignore diversity in understandings of spirituality. Instead education for spiritual development currently favours a naturalistic, or secular humanist model of spirituality based in shared human experience. The paper concludes that a recognition of diversity in understandings of spirituality should call into question the validity of education for spiritual development in state schools, where the acceptance of plurality of beliefs must be paramount.

Key concepts: Spirituality, Humanism, Spiritual development, Diversity (politics), Naturalism, Sociology, Psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Whose Model of Spirituality Should Be Used in the Spiritual Development of School Children? — Research Paper | ScholarLens