2006Medical PhysicsRequires access

SU-FF-T-56: A Simple Method for Selecting a Pinnacle IMRT Point for Verification in RadCalc

D Rothley, S Paras, Chris Clifton, Jyotirmoy Ray

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To select a reference point in a low dose gradient region of an IMRT treatment plan to enhance the MU and point dose agreement between Pinnacle and RadCalc. Method and Materials: After generating an IMRT plan within Pinnacle, we export it to RadCalc for a second check of the MU's. Frequently, the MU difference is significant for a plan with split beams or isocenter out of the field. In contrast to Pinnacle, RadCalc displays a coordinate grid over its BEV fluence. By utilizing this feature for the problematic beams, we selected reference points in low gradient regions of each beam's fluence map. In RadCalc's BEV, we identified the coordinate shifts relative to isocenter of the preferred points. We generated an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the updated coordinates in Pinnacle's 3-D CT-based coordinate system to reflect the desired point shift in RadCalc. These new coordinates were then entered in Pinnacle for the patient plan and re-exported to RadCalc. The modified MU and dose comparisons within RadCalc generally fell within 5% per beam. Results: While this method adds a few extra steps to the planning process, it provides a way to choose reference points whereby the MU's and point doses between Pinnacle and RadCalc are likely to agree within a few percent, and it makes determining the coordinates of such points a reasonably efficient process. Conclusion: RadCalc is a useful program for verifying IMRT MU's and point doses generated by Pinnacle. However because Pinnacle exports the user selected reference point (typically isocenter), there are common conditions in which RadCalc understandably determines large percent differences in calculations. Our method uses RadCalc's fluence map along with a spreadsheet to determine the Pinnacle coordinates of a preferred calculation point, rather than “guessing” where to place a POI to bring about better calculation agreement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To select a reference point in a low dose gradient region of an IMRT treatment plan to enhance the MU and point dose agreement between Pinnacle and RadCalc. Method and Materials: After generating an IMRT plan within Pinnacle, we export it to RadCalc for a second check of the MU's. Frequently, the MU difference is significant for a plan with split beams or isocenter out of the field. In contrast to Pinnacle, RadCalc displays a coordinate grid over its BEV fluence. By utilizing this feature for the problematic beams, we selected reference points in low gradient regions of each beam's fluence map. In RadCalc's BEV, we identified the coordinate shifts relative to isocenter of the preferred points. We generated an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the updated coordinates in Pinnacle's 3-D CT-based coordinate system to reflect the desired point shift in RadCalc. These new coordinates were then entered in Pinnacle for the patient plan and re-exported to RadCalc. The modified MU and dose comparisons within RadCalc generally fell within 5% per beam. Results: While this method adds a few extra steps to the planning process, it provides a way to choose reference points whereby the MU's and point doses between Pinnacle and RadCalc are likely to agree within a few percent, and it makes determining the coordinates of such points a reasonably efficient process. Conclusion: RadCalc is a useful program for verifying IMRT MU's and point doses generated by Pinnacle. However because Pinnacle exports the user selected reference point (typically isocenter), there are common conditions in which RadCalc understandably determines large percent differences in calculations. Our method uses RadCalc's fluence map along with a spreadsheet to determine the Pinnacle coordinates of a preferred calculation point, rather than “guessing” where to place a POI to bring about better calculation agreement.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To select a reference point in a low dose gradient region of an IMRT treatment plan to enhance the MU and point dose agreement between Pinnacle and RadCalc. Method and Materials: After generating an IMRT plan within Pinnacle, we export it to RadCalc for a second check of the MU's. Frequently, the MU difference is significant for a plan with split beams or isocenter out of the field. In contrast to Pinnacle, RadCalc displays a coordinate grid over its BEV fluence. By utilizing this feature for the problematic beams, we selected reference points in low gradient regions of each beam's fluence map. In RadCalc's BEV, we identified the coordinate shifts relative to isocenter of the preferred points. We generated an Excel spreadsheet to calculate the updated coordinates in Pinnacle's 3-D CT-based coordinate system to reflect the desired point shift in RadCalc. These new coordinates were then entered in Pinnacle for the patient plan and re-exported to RadCalc. The modified MU and dose comparisons within RadCalc generally fell within 5% per beam. Results: While this method adds a few extra steps to the planning process, it provides a way to choose reference points whereby the MU's and point doses between Pinnacle and RadCalc are likely to agree within a few percent, and it makes determining the coordinates of such points a reasonably efficient process. Conclusion: RadCalc is a useful program for verifying IMRT MU's and point doses generated by Pinnacle. However because Pinnacle exports the user selected reference point (typically isocenter), there are common conditions in which RadCalc understandably determines large percent differences in calculations. Our method uses RadCalc's fluence map along with a spreadsheet to determine the Pinnacle coordinates of a preferred calculation point, rather than “guessing” where to place a POI to bring about better calculation agreement.

Key concepts: Pinnacle, Isocenter, Point (geometry), Process (computing), Nuclear medicine, Coordinate system, Computer science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SU-FF-T-56: A Simple Method for Selecting a Pinnacle IMRT Point for Verification in RadCalc — Research Paper | ScholarLens