1979Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A PathologyRequires access

VACUOLIZATION OF THE GLOMERULAR BASEMENT MEMBRANE

G. Tallqvist, T Törnroth, T Vänttinen, Amos Pasternack

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Immunofluorescence and clinical data were collected retrospectively and renal tissue was examined by electron microscopy 1) for 20 consecutive patients whose glomeruli were normal in light microscopy except for vacuolization of obliquely‐cut portions of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) after periodic acid‐silver‐methenamine staining, and 2) for 10 control patients with completely normal glomeruli in light microscopy. By electron microscopy the biopsies with vacuolization showed two patterns of abnormalities. In pattern 1 (10 patients) the changes corresponded to the GBM changes in membranous glomerulonephritis or resolving acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, further confirmed by immunofluorescence and clinical data. In pattern II (10 patients) the GBM showed indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas very similar to but more sparsely distributed than the changes in pattern I. Patients with pattern II lesions had various renal diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, minimal changes glomerulonephritis, IgA‐IgG‐glomerulonephritis, graft rejection, and acute anuric tubulointerstitial nephritis, but clinical and immunofluorescence data did not differ from those of the controls. The hypothesis is presented that the indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas in patterns I and II are remnants or former subepithelial deposits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Immunofluorescence and clinical data were collected retrospectively and renal tissue was examined by electron microscopy 1) for 20 consecutive patients whose glomeruli were normal in light microscopy except for vacuolization of obliquely‐cut portions of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) after periodic acid‐silver‐methenamine staining, and 2) for 10 control patients with completely normal glomeruli in light microscopy. By electron microscopy the biopsies with vacuolization showed two patterns of abnormalities. In pattern 1 (10 patients) the changes corresponded to the GBM changes in membranous glomerulonephritis or resolving acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, further confirmed by immunofluorescence and clinical data. In pattern II (10 patients) the GBM showed indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas very similar to but more sparsely distributed than the changes in pattern I. Patients with pattern II lesions had various renal diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, minimal changes glomerulonephritis, IgA‐IgG‐glomerulonephritis, graft rejection, and acute anuric tubulointerstitial nephritis, but clinical and immunofluorescence data did not differ from those of the controls. The hypothesis is presented that the indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas in patterns I and II are remnants or former subepithelial deposits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Immunofluorescence and clinical data were collected retrospectively and renal tissue was examined by electron microscopy 1) for 20 consecutive patients whose glomeruli were normal in light microscopy except for vacuolization of obliquely‐cut portions of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) after periodic acid‐silver‐methenamine staining, and 2) for 10 control patients with completely normal glomeruli in light microscopy. By electron microscopy the biopsies with vacuolization showed two patterns of abnormalities. In pattern 1 (10 patients) the changes corresponded to the GBM changes in membranous glomerulonephritis or resolving acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, further confirmed by immunofluorescence and clinical data. In pattern II (10 patients) the GBM showed indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas very similar to but more sparsely distributed than the changes in pattern I. Patients with pattern II lesions had various renal diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, minimal changes glomerulonephritis, IgA‐IgG‐glomerulonephritis, graft rejection, and acute anuric tubulointerstitial nephritis, but clinical and immunofluorescence data did not differ from those of the controls. The hypothesis is presented that the indentations and intramembraneous lucent areas in patterns I and II are remnants or former subepithelial deposits.

Key concepts: Vacuolization, Pathology, Glomerulonephritis, Immunofluorescence, Basement membrane, Glomerular basement membrane, Lupus nephritis, Staining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
VACUOLIZATION OF THE GLOMERULAR BASEMENT MEMBRANE — Research Paper | ScholarLens