2003Practice Periodical of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste ManagementRequires access

Geotechnical Study for Hydraulic Barrier System at Tailings Pond

Manoj Datta

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Lead–zinc tailings fall under the category of hazardous waste as per the “Hazardous Waste Management And Handling Rules” notification in India. Groundwater protection measures are to be adopted for an unlined tailings pond in which such tailings are being disposed. This paper presents the process of selection of an appropriate hydraulic barrier system for the tailings pond through field and laboratory based geotechnical investigations. Results of subsurface site investigations are presented. Two hydraulic barrier systems are compared—one in the form of an intermediate liner system (horizontal) and the other, a vertical cutoff system. The relative advantages and costs associated with both systems are evaluated. The study shows that the vertical cutoff system is more cost effective and advantageous for the tailings pond because of the presence of sound rock at shallow depth. The design of backfill material for the cutoff wall, using bentonite as an additive, is highlighted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lead–zinc tailings fall under the category of hazardous waste as per the “Hazardous Waste Management And Handling Rules” notification in India. Groundwater protection measures are to be adopted for an unlined tailings pond in which such tailings are being disposed. This paper presents the process of selection of an appropriate hydraulic barrier system for the tailings pond through field and laboratory based geotechnical investigations. Results of subsurface site investigations are presented. Two hydraulic barrier systems are compared—one in the form of an intermediate liner system (horizontal) and the other, a vertical cutoff system. The relative advantages and costs associated with both systems are evaluated. The study shows that the vertical cutoff system is more cost effective and advantageous for the tailings pond because of the presence of sound rock at shallow depth. The design of backfill material for the cutoff wall, using bentonite as an additive, is highlighted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lead–zinc tailings fall under the category of hazardous waste as per the “Hazardous Waste Management And Handling Rules” notification in India. Groundwater protection measures are to be adopted for an unlined tailings pond in which such tailings are being disposed. This paper presents the process of selection of an appropriate hydraulic barrier system for the tailings pond through field and laboratory based geotechnical investigations. Results of subsurface site investigations are presented. Two hydraulic barrier systems are compared—one in the form of an intermediate liner system (horizontal) and the other, a vertical cutoff system. The relative advantages and costs associated with both systems are evaluated. The study shows that the vertical cutoff system is more cost effective and advantageous for the tailings pond because of the presence of sound rock at shallow depth. The design of backfill material for the cutoff wall, using bentonite as an additive, is highlighted.

Key concepts: Tailings, Hazardous waste, Geotechnical engineering, Levee, Groundwater, Mining engineering, Cushion, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Geotechnical Study for Hydraulic Barrier System at Tailings Pond — Research Paper | ScholarLens