2003Housing Policy DebateRequires access

Comment on Chester Hartman and David Robinson's “Evictions: The hidden housing problem”

Lenore Monello Schloming, Skip Schloming

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

People have often flourished by wandering, so displacement and mobility are not inherently bad. The “hidden” problem is not evictions, but how homelessness has been caused by protections enacted in the name of helping the poor. The effect of eviction protections is to prolong the eviction process, causing income loss and expenses that small property owners, who own much private rental housing used by the poor, cannot absorb. Over the past few decades, a large segment of low‐cost private rental housing has been abandoned, and rooming houses have almost entirely disappeared—all coinciding with the enactment of eviction protections and the rise of homelessness. If rooming houses were made viable once more, as much as 80 percent of the homeless could be housed in private rental housing, allowing public resources to be redirected to the hard‐core homeless. Private rooming houses are especially critical for our growing elder population.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

People have often flourished by wandering, so displacement and mobility are not inherently bad. The “hidden” problem is not evictions, but how homelessness has been caused by protections enacted in the name of helping the poor. The effect of eviction protections is to prolong the eviction process, causing income loss and expenses that small property owners, who own much private rental housing used by the poor, cannot absorb. Over the past few decades, a large segment of low‐cost private rental housing has been abandoned, and rooming houses have almost entirely disappeared—all coinciding with the enactment of eviction protections and the rise of homelessness. If rooming houses were made viable once more, as much as 80 percent of the homeless could be housed in private rental housing, allowing public resources to be redirected to the hard‐core homeless. Private rooming houses are especially critical for our growing elder population.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

People have often flourished by wandering, so displacement and mobility are not inherently bad. The “hidden” problem is not evictions, but how homelessness has been caused by protections enacted in the name of helping the poor. The effect of eviction protections is to prolong the eviction process, causing income loss and expenses that small property owners, who own much private rental housing used by the poor, cannot absorb. Over the past few decades, a large segment of low‐cost private rental housing has been abandoned, and rooming houses have almost entirely disappeared—all coinciding with the enactment of eviction protections and the rise of homelessness. If rooming houses were made viable once more, as much as 80 percent of the homeless could be housed in private rental housing, allowing public resources to be redirected to the hard‐core homeless. Private rooming houses are especially critical for our growing elder population.

Key concepts: Eviction, Renting, Rental housing, Business, Population, Law, Political science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comment on Chester Hartman and David Robinson's “Evictions: The hidden housing problem” — Research Paper | ScholarLens