1973Geophysical Journal InternationalOpen access

P Signal Complexity Re-examined

A. Douglas, Peter Marshall, P.G. Gibbs, John Young, C. Blarney

Open full text 39 citations

Abstract

The early recordings made by short-period seismometer arrays showed clearly that P signals differ very widely in their complexity. Many attempts have been made to explain this complexity and here evidence is presented to show that greater absorption of the direct signal relative to the later arrivals may be the principal explanation of complexity at least for explosion signals. Deconvolution and synthesis of explosion signals is used to demonstrate that multipathing also contributes to complexity. From a comparison of explosion signals from sites in shield areas with those from sites in or near fold belts it is suggested that fold belts are underlain by regions of much lower Q than shield areas. Thus methods of discriminating between earthquake and explosion signals that are based on the observed differences between explosion signals from sites in shield areas and earthquake signals from foci in fold belts, may not then be measuring differences in the two sources but rather differences in Q in the upper mantle in the source regions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The early recordings made by short-period seismometer arrays showed clearly that P signals differ very widely in their complexity. Many attempts have been made to explain this complexity and here evidence is presented to show that greater absorption of the direct signal relative to the later arrivals may be the principal explanation of complexity at least for explosion signals. Deconvolution and synthesis of explosion signals is used to demonstrate that multipathing also contributes to complexity. From a comparison of explosion signals from sites in shield areas with those from sites in or near fold belts it is suggested that fold belts are underlain by regions of much lower Q than shield areas. Thus methods of discriminating between earthquake and explosion signals that are based on the observed differences between explosion signals from sites in shield areas and earthquake signals from foci in fold belts, may not then be measuring differences in the two sources but rather differences in Q in the upper mantle in the source regions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The early recordings made by short-period seismometer arrays showed clearly that P signals differ very widely in their complexity. Many attempts have been made to explain this complexity and here evidence is presented to show that greater absorption of the direct signal relative to the later arrivals may be the principal explanation of complexity at least for explosion signals. Deconvolution and synthesis of explosion signals is used to demonstrate that multipathing also contributes to complexity. From a comparison of explosion signals from sites in shield areas with those from sites in or near fold belts it is suggested that fold belts are underlain by regions of much lower Q than shield areas. Thus methods of discriminating between earthquake and explosion signals that are based on the observed differences between explosion signals from sites in shield areas and earthquake signals from foci in fold belts, may not then be measuring differences in the two sources but rather differences in Q in the upper mantle in the source regions.

Key concepts: SIGNAL (programming language), Deconvolution, Computational complexity theory, Structural complexity, Algorithm, Computer science, Seismometer, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P Signal Complexity Re-examined — Research Paper | ScholarLens