P Signal Complexity Re-examined
A. Douglas, Peter Marshall, P.G. Gibbs, John Young, C. Blarney
Abstract
Open-access reader
A. Douglas, Peter Marshall, P.G. Gibbs, John Young, C. Blarney
Abstract
Open-access reader
The early recordings made by short-period seismometer arrays showed clearly that P signals differ very widely in their complexity. Many attempts have been made to explain this complexity and here evidence is presented to show that greater absorption of the direct signal relative to the later arrivals may be the principal explanation of complexity at least for explosion signals. Deconvolution and synthesis of explosion signals is used to demonstrate that multipathing also contributes to complexity. From a comparison of explosion signals from sites in shield areas with those from sites in or near fold belts it is suggested that fold belts are underlain by regions of much lower Q than shield areas. Thus methods of discriminating between earthquake and explosion signals that are based on the observed differences between explosion signals from sites in shield areas and earthquake signals from foci in fold belts, may not then be measuring differences in the two sources but rather differences in Q in the upper mantle in the source regions.
OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The early recordings made by short-period seismometer arrays showed clearly that P signals differ very widely in their complexity. Many attempts have been made to explain this complexity and here evidence is presented to show that greater absorption of the direct signal relative to the later arrivals may be the principal explanation of complexity at least for explosion signals. Deconvolution and synthesis of explosion signals is used to demonstrate that multipathing also contributes to complexity. From a comparison of explosion signals from sites in shield areas with those from sites in or near fold belts it is suggested that fold belts are underlain by regions of much lower Q than shield areas. Thus methods of discriminating between earthquake and explosion signals that are based on the observed differences between explosion signals from sites in shield areas and earthquake signals from foci in fold belts, may not then be measuring differences in the two sources but rather differences in Q in the upper mantle in the source regions.
Key concepts: SIGNAL (programming language), Deconvolution, Computational complexity theory, Structural complexity, Algorithm, Computer science, Seismometer, Geology