1970The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Dichotic and Monotic Time-Staggered Speech Perception

Charles I. Berlín, Carl F. Loovis, Sena S. Lowe, John K. Cullen

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

At the previous meeting of this Society, we reported a lag effect in which the trailing syllable in a dichotic pair was more intelligible with time staggers at 15, 30, 60, and 90 msec. This paper presents data on 12 subjects who listened to time staggers of 90, 180, 250, and 500 msec. A special condition was also added in which the periodic portions of each pair were aligned without concern for the burst onset of the consonant. We called this the “boundary condition” and included it as a result of our observation that the voiceless consonant when paired with a voiced consonant is generally more intelligible in the dichotic condition. Both ears functioned about the same beyond 180-msec staggers. However, we found the boundary condition enhanced the right ear laterality effect and attenuated the voiceless over voiced preponderance seen in ordinary dichotic simultaneous listening. [Supported by the NIH.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At the previous meeting of this Society, we reported a lag effect in which the trailing syllable in a dichotic pair was more intelligible with time staggers at 15, 30, 60, and 90 msec. This paper presents data on 12 subjects who listened to time staggers of 90, 180, 250, and 500 msec. A special condition was also added in which the periodic portions of each pair were aligned without concern for the burst onset of the consonant. We called this the “boundary condition” and included it as a result of our observation that the voiceless consonant when paired with a voiced consonant is generally more intelligible in the dichotic condition. Both ears functioned about the same beyond 180-msec staggers. However, we found the boundary condition enhanced the right ear laterality effect and attenuated the voiceless over voiced preponderance seen in ordinary dichotic simultaneous listening. [Supported by the NIH.]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At the previous meeting of this Society, we reported a lag effect in which the trailing syllable in a dichotic pair was more intelligible with time staggers at 15, 30, 60, and 90 msec. This paper presents data on 12 subjects who listened to time staggers of 90, 180, 250, and 500 msec. A special condition was also added in which the periodic portions of each pair were aligned without concern for the burst onset of the consonant. We called this the “boundary condition” and included it as a result of our observation that the voiceless consonant when paired with a voiced consonant is generally more intelligible in the dichotic condition. Both ears functioned about the same beyond 180-msec staggers. However, we found the boundary condition enhanced the right ear laterality effect and attenuated the voiceless over voiced preponderance seen in ordinary dichotic simultaneous listening. [Supported by the NIH.]

Key concepts: Dichotic listening, Consonant, Syllable, Audiology, Laterality, Psychology, Acoustics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dichotic and Monotic Time-Staggered Speech Perception — Research Paper | ScholarLens