ScholarLens Back to search
2010•Legal EthicsRequires access

Judicial Regulation of the Legal Profession: Correspondent's Report from Canada

Alice Woolley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The substance and import of the Supreme Court's decisions R v Cunningham and Fullowka v Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd for the ethical and legal obligations of Canadian lawyers are discussed. The challenges and opportunities that the intervention of the Court into the regulation of the legal profession present are highlighted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The substance and import of the Supreme Court's decisions R v Cunningham and Fullowka v Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd for the ethical and legal obligations of Canadian lawyers are discussed. The challenges and opportunities that the intervention of the Court into the regulation of the legal profession present are highlighted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The substance and import of the Supreme Court's decisions R v Cunningham and Fullowka v Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd for the ethical and legal obligations of Canadian lawyers are discussed. The challenges and opportunities that the intervention of the Court into the regulation of the legal profession present are highlighted.

Key concepts: Law, Political science, Legal profession, Legal ethics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial Regulation of the Legal Profession: Correspondent's Report from Canada — Research Paper | ScholarLens