1994•Journal of Symbolic LogicRequires access

Models of arithmetic and upper bounds for arithmetic sets

A. H. Lachlan, Robert Irving Soare

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract We settle a question in the literature about degrees of models of true arithmetic and upper bounds for the arithmetic sets. We prove that there is a model of true arithmetic whose degree is not a uniform upper bound for the arithmetic sets. The proof involves two forcing constructions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract We settle a question in the literature about degrees of models of true arithmetic and upper bounds for the arithmetic sets. We prove that there is a model of true arithmetic whose degree is not a uniform upper bound for the arithmetic sets. The proof involves two forcing constructions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract We settle a question in the literature about degrees of models of true arithmetic and upper bounds for the arithmetic sets. We prove that there is a model of true arithmetic whose degree is not a uniform upper bound for the arithmetic sets. The proof involves two forcing constructions.

Key concepts: Arithmetic, Arithmetic circuit complexity, Mathematics, Arbitrary-precision arithmetic, Saturation arithmetic, Affine arithmetic, Forcing (mathematics), Second-order arithmetic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Models of arithmetic and upper bounds for arithmetic sets — Research Paper | ScholarLens