1999Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryRequires access

Correlation between MRI-Based Stereotactic Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement, Macroelectrode Stimulation and Clinical Response to Tremor Control

Fardad Mobin, Antonio A. F. De Salles, Eric J. Behnke, Robert C. Frysinger

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

In this study we compared the position of the electronically active contact of the thalamic (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode to the stereotactic location of its tip. Fifteen patients with either Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET) underwent stereotactic, MRI-based placement of the Medtronic quadripolar DBS electrode. An overall improvement of 69% was achieved in the tremor scores during a period of 1-13 months after implantation of the DBS electrode. Eleven patients with ET showed 70% clinical improvement of tremor, compared to a 58% response observed in the 4 patients with PD. The electrode tip center was 11.2 +/- 1.54 mm lateral to the third ventricular wall, 5.38 +/- 1.02 mm anterior to the posterior commissure and 2.9 +/- 3.57 mm inferior to the level of AC-PC line. The most significant deviation from the planned stereotactic target was observed in the Z-coordinate. In our group of patients, stimulation settings favored the contacts closer to the AC-PC line, correcting the electrode tip position to 0.80 +/- 2.84 mm (p < 0.001) inferior to the level of the AC-PC line. In our experience, thalamic DBS offers a reversible and adjustable 'lesion' to compensate for the anatomic variabilities encountered in the positioning of the DBS electrode tip.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study we compared the position of the electronically active contact of the thalamic (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode to the stereotactic location of its tip. Fifteen patients with either Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET) underwent stereotactic, MRI-based placement of the Medtronic quadripolar DBS electrode. An overall improvement of 69% was achieved in the tremor scores during a period of 1-13 months after implantation of the DBS electrode. Eleven patients with ET showed 70% clinical improvement of tremor, compared to a 58% response observed in the 4 patients with PD. The electrode tip center was 11.2 +/- 1.54 mm lateral to the third ventricular wall, 5.38 +/- 1.02 mm anterior to the posterior commissure and 2.9 +/- 3.57 mm inferior to the level of AC-PC line. The most significant deviation from the planned stereotactic target was observed in the Z-coordinate. In our group of patients, stimulation settings favored the contacts closer to the AC-PC line, correcting the electrode tip position to 0.80 +/- 2.84 mm (p < 0.001) inferior to the level of the AC-PC line. In our experience, thalamic DBS offers a reversible and adjustable 'lesion' to compensate for the anatomic variabilities encountered in the positioning of the DBS electrode tip.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study we compared the position of the electronically active contact of the thalamic (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode to the stereotactic location of its tip. Fifteen patients with either Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET) underwent stereotactic, MRI-based placement of the Medtronic quadripolar DBS electrode. An overall improvement of 69% was achieved in the tremor scores during a period of 1-13 months after implantation of the DBS electrode. Eleven patients with ET showed 70% clinical improvement of tremor, compared to a 58% response observed in the 4 patients with PD. The electrode tip center was 11.2 +/- 1.54 mm lateral to the third ventricular wall, 5.38 +/- 1.02 mm anterior to the posterior commissure and 2.9 +/- 3.57 mm inferior to the level of AC-PC line. The most significant deviation from the planned stereotactic target was observed in the Z-coordinate. In our group of patients, stimulation settings favored the contacts closer to the AC-PC line, correcting the electrode tip position to 0.80 +/- 2.84 mm (p < 0.001) inferior to the level of the AC-PC line. In our experience, thalamic DBS offers a reversible and adjustable 'lesion' to compensate for the anatomic variabilities encountered in the positioning of the DBS electrode tip.

Key concepts: Deep brain stimulation, Essential tremor, Stereotactic surgery, Posterior commissure, Medicine, Stimulation, Parkinson's disease, Magnetic resonance imaging

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Correlation between MRI-Based Stereotactic Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement, Macroelectrode Stimulation and Clinical Response to Tremor Control — Research Paper | ScholarLens