Testing Estimator's Credibility¿Part II: Other Tests
Xiaoning Li, Zhanlue Zhao
Abstract
Xiaoning Li, Zhanlue Zhao
Abstract
For pt.I see ibid., p.Z001330-7 (2006). Many estimators and filters provide assessments of their own estimation error. Are these self-assessments trustable? What is the degree to which they are trustable? This is Part II of a two-part series that provides answers to some of these questions, referred to as the credibility of the estimators. It proposes several tests for credibility and a test-based solution to the problem of comparing estimators' credibility. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the utility and effectiveness of the proposed tests
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For pt.I see ibid., p.Z001330-7 (2006). Many estimators and filters provide assessments of their own estimation error. Are these self-assessments trustable? What is the degree to which they are trustable? This is Part II of a two-part series that provides answers to some of these questions, referred to as the credibility of the estimators. It proposes several tests for credibility and a test-based solution to the problem of comparing estimators' credibility. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the utility and effectiveness of the proposed tests
Key concepts: Credibility, Estimator, Computer science, Test (biology), Series (stratigraphy), Degree (music), Econometrics, Mathematics