ScholarLens Back to search
2011•Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesRequires access

Research performance of RAS institutions and Russian universities: A comparative bibliometric analysis

Yu. V. Mokhnacheva, Т. Н. Харыбина

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an ongoing debate in periodicals and on the Web about the quality and productivity of research carried out by different Russian organizations. Much criticism has been aimed at academic science, which is increasingly often opposed to university science. This article attempts to evaluate the contribution of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and Russian universities on the basis of a bibliometric analysis of the 2000–2009 publications included into the Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Essential Science Indicators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent years have witnessed an ongoing debate in periodicals and on the Web about the quality and productivity of research carried out by different Russian organizations. Much criticism has been aimed at academic science, which is increasingly often opposed to university science. This article attempts to evaluate the contribution of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and Russian universities on the basis of a bibliometric analysis of the 2000–2009 publications included into the Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Essential Science Indicators.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent years have witnessed an ongoing debate in periodicals and on the Web about the quality and productivity of research carried out by different Russian organizations. Much criticism has been aimed at academic science, which is increasingly often opposed to university science. This article attempts to evaluate the contribution of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and Russian universities on the basis of a bibliometric analysis of the 2000–2009 publications included into the Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Essential Science Indicators.

Key concepts: Web of science, Criticism, Political science, Bibliometrics, Library science, Productivity, Quality (philosophy), Social science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research performance of RAS institutions and Russian universities: A comparative bibliometric analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens