Pattern of cross‐resistance in pyrethroid‐selected populations of Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lep., Noctuidae) from India
T. Ramasubramanian, A. Regupathy
Abstract
Open-access reader
T. Ramasubramanian, A. Regupathy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract: In Helicoverpa armigera, withdrawal of selection pressure resulted in a two‐ to fourfold increase in susceptibility to synthetic pyrethroids and continuous selection enhanced the resistance level by four‐ to fivefold to the respective pyrethroids at the end of the 14th generation. Populations selected for resistance to one pyrethroid showed positive cross‐resistance to all other pyrethroids, but no cross‐resistance to endosulfan and thiodicarb. There was a significant increase in mixed‐function oxidase activity with advancing generation suggesting its possible role in the positive cross‐resistance among the pyrethroids. The induction of carboxyl esterases in pyrethroid‐selected populations may have resulted in the activation of indoxacarb, thereby accounting for the observed negative cross‐resistance.
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract: In Helicoverpa armigera, withdrawal of selection pressure resulted in a two‐ to fourfold increase in susceptibility to synthetic pyrethroids and continuous selection enhanced the resistance level by four‐ to fivefold to the respective pyrethroids at the end of the 14th generation. Populations selected for resistance to one pyrethroid showed positive cross‐resistance to all other pyrethroids, but no cross‐resistance to endosulfan and thiodicarb. There was a significant increase in mixed‐function oxidase activity with advancing generation suggesting its possible role in the positive cross‐resistance among the pyrethroids. The induction of carboxyl esterases in pyrethroid‐selected populations may have resulted in the activation of indoxacarb, thereby accounting for the observed negative cross‐resistance.
Key concepts: Helicoverpa armigera, Indoxacarb, Biology, Noctuidae, Pyrethroid, Cross-resistance, Endosulfan, Insecticide resistance